Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Sep;39(8):949-62.
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu042. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of health promotion interventions for children and adolescents using an ecological framework

Christopher C Cushing  1 , Erin E Brannon  2 , Kristina I Suorsa  2 , Dawn K Wilson  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of health promotion interventions for children and adolescents using an ecological framework

Christopher C Cushing et al. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and quantify the evidence for health promotion interventions in children and adolescents.

Method: 96 independent samples of smoking, physical activity, and diet studies were included. Outcomes included both objective and self-reports of health behavior, as well as proxy measures such as fitness.

Results: The aggregated effect was significant (g = .20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-0.32, n = 96). A significant effect of intervention was observed at approximately 1-year follow-up (g = .07, 95% CI = 0.02-0.14, n = 20). The greatest risk of bias was failure to blind outcome assessment, which occurred in 21% of studies. Most studies lacked sufficient detail to determine the quality of their randomization sequence (58%). Additional concerns about risk of bias for individual studies were minimal. Overall, the quality of this finding was moderate using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria.

Conclusion: Health promotion interventions are effective for modifying health behavior; however, effect sizes are small.

Keywords: health behavior; health promotion and prevention; meta-analysis; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Risk of bias graph.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology. 2008;27:379–387. - PubMed
    1. Adhikari B, Kahende J, Malarcher A, Pechacek T, Tong V. Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses. Oncology Times. 2009;31:40.
    1. Baranowski T, Baranowski J C, Cullen K W, Thompson D I, Nicklas T, Zakeri I E, Rochon J. The Fun, Food, and Fitness Project (FFFP): The Baylor GEMS pilot study. Ethnic Disparities. 2003;13:30–39. - PubMed
    1. Beech B M, Klesges R C, Kumanyika S K, Murray D M, Klesges L, McClanahan B, Slawson D, Nunnally C, Rochon J, McLain-Allen B, Pree-Cary J. Child and parent-targeted interventions: The Memphis GEMS pilot study. Ethnicity and Disease. 2003;13:S1–S40. - PubMed
    1. Biglan A, Ary DV, Smolkowski K, Duncan T, Black C. A randomized controlled trial of a community intervention to prevent adolescent tobacco use. Tobacco Control. 2000;9:24–32. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types