A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology
- PMID: 24934487
- PMCID: PMC4188433
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.020
A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology
Abstract
Objective: To develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) for 2004-2011.
Design: Longitudinal cohort.
Setting: Clinic-based data.
Patient(s): 288,161 women with an initial autologous cycle, of whom 89,855 did not become pregnant and had a second autologous cycle and 39,334 did not become pregnant in the first and second cycles and had a third autologous cycle, with an additional 33,598 women who had a cycle using donor oocytes (first donor cycle).
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): LBRs and MBRs modeled by woman's age, body mass index, gravidity, prior full-term births, infertility diagnoses by oocyte source, fresh embryos transferred, and cycle, using backward-stepping logistic regression with results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals.
Result(s): The LBRs increased in all models with prior full-term births, number of embryos transferred; in autologous cycles also with gravidity, diagnoses of male factor, and ovulation disorders; and in donor cycles also with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve. The MBR increased in all models with number of embryos transferred and in donor cycles also with prior full-term births. For both autologous and donor cycles, transferring two versus one embryo greatly increased the probability of a multiple birth (AOR 27.25 and 38.90, respectively).
Conclusion(s): This validated predictive model will be implemented on the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Web site (www.sart.org) so that patients considering initiating a course of ART can input their data on the Web site to generate their expected outcomes.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; BMI; donor cycle; prediction model.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Male factor infertility: Prediction models for assisted reproductive technology.Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Sep;11(9):492-3. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.181. Epub 2014 Jul 29. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 25069731 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):676.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25683965 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):183-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev288. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 26577302 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology.Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1242. Epub 2014 Sep 11. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 25217871 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. PMID: 18773532 Review.
-
What is the best treatment option for infertile women aged 40 and over?J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013 Jun;30(5):667-71. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-9980-6. Epub 2013 Mar 29. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013. PMID: 23536151 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Predicted probabilities of live birth following assisted reproductive technology using United States national surveillance data from 2016 to 2018.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5):557.e1-557.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Jan 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36702210 Free PMC article.
-
Nomogram for the cumulative live birth in women undergoing the first IVF cycle: Base on 26, 689 patients in China.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 25;13:900829. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.900829. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36093101 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Individualized embryo selection strategy developed by stacking machine learning model for better in vitro fertilization outcomes: an application study.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Apr 5;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00734-z. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 33820565 Free PMC article.
-
Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.Reprod Sci. 2021 Feb;28(2):495-509. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00307-2. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Reprod Sci. 2021. PMID: 32886340 Review.
-
Predicting cumulative live birth for couples beginning their second complete cycle of in vitro fertilization treatment.Hum Reprod. 2022 Aug 25;37(9):2075-2086. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac152. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35866894 Free PMC article.
References
-
- SART releases new annual report on IVF procedures. ASRM Bull. 2014 Feb 17;16(12)
-
- Stern JE, Cedars MI, Jain T, Klein NA, Beaird CM, Grainger DA, et al. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:275–82. - PubMed
-
-
Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act. Pub. L. No. 102–493 (codified at 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 201, 263(a)(1–7) (Suppl 1994)).
-
-
- Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Lancet. 1996;348:1402–6. - PubMed
-
- Stolwijk AM, Zielhuis GA, Hamilton CJCM, Straatman H, Hollanders JMG, Goverde HJM, et al. Prognostic models for the probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and the importance of testing their predictive value. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2298–303. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical