Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;21(12):3859-64.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3838-8. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Robotic thyroidectomy for cancer in the US: patterns of use and short-term outcomes

Affiliations

Robotic thyroidectomy for cancer in the US: patterns of use and short-term outcomes

Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Background: We describe nationally representative patterns of utilization and short-term outcomes from robotic versus open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer.

Methods: Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were used to analyze patterns of use of robotic thyroidectomy from the National Cancer Database (2010-2011). Short-term outcomes were compared between patients undergoing robotic versus open thyroidectomy, while adjusting for confounders.

Results: A total of 68,393 patients with thyroid cancer underwent thyroidectomy; 225 had robotic surgery and 57,729 underwent open surgery. Robotic thyroid surgery use increased by 30 % from 2010 to 2011 (p = 0.08). Robotic cases were reported from 93 centers, with 89 centers performing <10 robotic cases. Compared with the open group, the robotic group was younger (51 vs. 47 years; p < 0.01) and included more Asian patients (4 vs. 8 %; p = 0.006) and privately-insured patients (68 vs. 77 %; p = 0.01). Tumor size was similar between patients undergoing robotic versus open surgery. Total thyroidectomy was performed less frequently in the robotic group (67 vs. 84 % open; p < 0.0001). Patients were relatively more likely to undergo robotic surgery if they were female (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; p = 0.04), younger (OR 0.8/10 years; p < 0.0001), or underwent lobectomy (OR 2.4; p < 0.0001). In adjusted multivariable analysis, there were no differences in the number of lymph nodes removed or length of stay between groups; however, there was a non-significant increase in the incidence of positive margins with robotic thyroidectomy.

Conclusions: Use of robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer is limited to a few institutions, with short-term outcomes that are comparable to open surgery. Multi-institutional studies should be undertaken to compare thyroidectomy-specific complications and long-term outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Variation in robotic thyroidectomy case volume among hospitals performing robotic cases for thyroid cancer (2010–2011)
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Summary of the distribution of hospitals performing robotic thyroidectomy and corresponding robotic cases in the three robotic volume categories; hospitals in the top two volume categories (four hospitals) performed 30 % of all robotic cases for cancer (2010–2011)

References

    1. Davies L, Welch HG. Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(4):317–22. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society [1 Mar 2014];Cancer facts & figures. 2013 http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/docume....
    1. Shaha AR. Implications of prognostic factors and risk groups in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(3):393–402. - PubMed
    1. Hannan SA. The magnificent seven: a history of modern thyroid surgery. Int J Surg. 2006;4(3):187–91. - PubMed
    1. Giddings AE. The history of thyroidectomy. J R Soc Med. 1998;91(Suppl 33):3–6. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms