Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus single-agent paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance)
- PMID: 24934787
- PMCID: PMC4105484
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.7142
Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus single-agent paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance)
Abstract
Purpose: Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer balances efficacy and toxicity. We sought to determine whether single-agent paclitaxel (T) was inferior to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), when each was administered for four or six cycles of therapy, and whether it offered less toxicity.
Patients and methods: Patients with operable breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive nodes were enrolled onto the study to address the noninferiority of single-agent T to AC, defined as the one-sided 95% upper-bound CI (UCB) of hazard ratio (HR) of T versus AC less than 1.30 for the primary end point of relapse-free survival (RFS). As a 2 × 2 factorial design, duration of therapy was also addressed and was previously reported.
Results: With 3,871 patients enrolled onto the trial, a median follow-up period of 6.1 years, and 437 RFS events, we achieved an HR of 1.26 (one sided 95% UCB, 1.48; favoring AC does not allow a conclusion of noninferiority of T with AC; UCB > 1.3). With 266 patient deaths, the HR for overall survival (OS) was 1.27 favoring AC (UCB, 1.56). The estimated absolute advantage of AC at 5 years is 3% for RFS (91 v 88%) and 1% for OS (95 v 94%). All nine treatment-related deaths were patients receiving AC and are included in the analyses of both RFS and OS. Hematologic toxicity was more common in patients treated with AC, and neuropathy was more common in patients treated with T.
Conclusion: This trial did not show noninferiority of T to AC, a conclusion that is unlikely to change with additional events and follow-up. T was less toxic than AC.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00041119.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures
Comment in
-
Twenty-twenty hindsight: an adjuvant breast cancer trial through the retrospectoscope.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;32(22):2284-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.9344. Epub 2014 Jun 16. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24934788 No abstract available.
-
Should adjuvant weekly paclitaxel be considered less efficacious than anthracyclines plus cyclophosphamide for lower-risk patients with early-stage breast cancer?J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):290. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.7923. Epub 2014 Dec 15. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25512451 No abstract available.
-
Reply to V. Amoroso et al.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):291. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1875. Epub 2014 Dec 15. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25512457 No abstract available.
References
-
- Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. For the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET): Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1784–1792. - PubMed
-
- Fisher B, Brown AM, Dimitrov NV, et al. Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: Results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1483–1496. - PubMed
-
- Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, et al. Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:976–983. - PubMed
-
- Mamounas EP, Bryant J, Lembersky B, et al. Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive primary breast cancer: Results from NSABP B-28. J Clin Oncol. 2003;23:3686–3696. - PubMed
-
- Goldstein LJ, O'Neill A, Sparano JA, et al. Concurrent doxorubicin plus docetaxel is not more effective than concurrent doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in operable breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E 2197. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4092–4099. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
- CA33601/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA47577/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA033601/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180821/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA045418/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA032102/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180882/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA47559/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA45418/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA31946/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA047577/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA032291/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA016672/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA077658/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA32291/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CA032102/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA021115/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA031946/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA3360/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA77651/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA047559/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA077651/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA015083/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA233180/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180820/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA25224/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA77658/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180867/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180838/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA21115/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA025224/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180888/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
