Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 16:14:256.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-256.

Peer support for stroke survivors: a case study

Dorothy Kessler  1 , Mary Egan, Lucy-Ann Kubina
Affiliations

Peer support for stroke survivors: a case study

Dorothy Kessler et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Innovative and sustainable programs are required to support the well-being of stroke survivors. Peer support is a potentially low cost way to enhance well-being of recent stroke survivors and the well-being and community reintegration of their peer supporters. This article describes the perceptions of stroke survivors, care partners, peer supporters, and professionals of an individual peer support program.

Methods: An instrumental case study design was used to examine a volunteer peer support program that provides acute care visits and telephone follow-up post-discharge. In particular, a) type of support provided, b) benefits for the stroke survivor and care partner, c) potential harms to the stroke survivor, d) impact of providing support on the peer supporter, and e) required processes were considered. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 16 new stroke survivors and 8 care partners immediately following hospital discharge and then 6 months later, and with 7 peer supporters, 3 program co-ordinators and 4 health professionals to gather feedback from multiple stakeholders.

Results: Emotional, affirmational and informational support were perceived as being offered by the peer supporters. Peer visits were perceived as providing encouragement, motivation, validation, and decreased feelings of being alone. However, the visits were not perceived as beneficial to all stroke survivors. The impact on the peer supporters included increased social connections, personal growth, enjoyment, and feelings of making a difference in the lives of others. Involvement of the healthcare team, peer supporter training and a skilled coordinator were crucial to the success this program.

Conclusions: Peer support can potentially enhance service to stroke survivors and promote community reintegration for peer volunteers. Further research is needed to determine the preferred format and timing of peer support, and the characteristics of stroke survivors most likely to benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphine S, Cote R, Durcam L, Carleton J. Activity, participation and quality of life 6 months post stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;14:1035–1042. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33984. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robinson-Smith G. Self-efficacy and quality of life after stroke. J Neurosci Nursing. 2002;14:91–98. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200204000-00008. - DOI
    1. Wyller TB, Kirkevold M. How does a cerebral stroke affect quality of life? Towards an adequate theoretical account. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;14:152–161. doi: 10.1080/096382899297765. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson S. PhD Thesis. Centre for Health Promotion Studies. Edmonton: University of Alberta; 2010. Community living after stroke: An ecological model.
    1. Kessler D, Dubouloz C, Urbanowski R, Egan M. Meaning perspective transformation following stroke: the process of change. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;14:1056–1065. doi: 10.1080/09638280802509512. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types