Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Aug;21(4):287-92.
doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000076.

Biomarkers in type 1 diabetes: application to the clinical trial setting

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers in type 1 diabetes: application to the clinical trial setting

James E Tooley et al. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Biomarkers of type 1 diabetes (T1D) are important for assessing risk of developing disease, monitoring disease progression, and determining responses to clinical treatments. Here we review recent advances in the development of biomarkers of T1D with a focus on their utility in clinical trials.

Recent findings: Measurements of autoantibodies and metabolic outcomes have been the foundation of monitoring T1D for the past 20 years. Recent advancements have led to improvements in T-cell-specific assays that have been used in large-scale clinical trials to measure antigen-specific T cell responses. Additionally, new tools are being developed for the measurement of β cell mass and death that will allow for more direct measurement of disease activity. Lastly, recent studies have used both immunologic and nonimmunologic biomarkers to identify responders to treatments in clinical trials.

Summary: Use of biomarkers in the study of T1D has largely not changed over the past 20 years; however, recent advancements in the field are establishing new techniques that allow for more precise monitoring of disease progression. These new tools will ultimately lead to an improvement in understanding of disease and will be utilized in clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Herold K, Vignali DA, Cooke A, Bluestone J. Type 1 diabetes: Translating mechanistic observations into effective clinical outcomes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Ehlers MR, Gottlieb PA, Greenbaum CJ, Hagopian W, et al. Teplizumab (anti-CD3 mAb) treatment preserves C-peptide responses in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial: Metabolic and immunologic features at baseline identify a subgroup of responders. Diabetes. 2013 Jul 8; Patients treated with teplizumab in the AbATE trial had a 75% improvement in C-peptide response compared to controls at 2 years. Responders to treatment were distinguished from non-responders by HbA1c, insulin usage and immunologic parameters. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Masharani U, Hagopian W, Bisikirska B, Donaldson D, et al. A Single Course of Anti-CD3 Monoclonal Antibody hOKT3{gamma}1(Ala-Ala) Results in Improvement in C-Peptide Responses and Clinical Parameters for at Least 2 Years after Onset of Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2005 Jun;54(6):1763–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Willi SM, Gottlieb PA, Waldron-Lynch F, Devine L, et al. Teplizumab treatment may improve C-peptide responses in participants with type 1 diabetes after the new-onset period: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2012 Oct 21; Patients treated with teplizumab after the new onset period may still receive benefits in preservation of C-peptide response. Responders to treatement had an increase in CD8+ central memory cells at 3 months after treatement and tended to be younger and have decreased HbA1c at study entry. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herold KC, Hagopian W, Auger JA, Poumian-Ruiz E, Taylor L, Donaldson D, et al. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(22):1692–8. - PubMed

Publication types