Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;107(4):220-4.
doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000087.

Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center

Affiliations

Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center

Anoop Appannagari et al. South Med J. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Poor bowel preparation leads to inadequate examinations and shorter surveillance intervals for colorectal cancer screening. Previous studies regarding risk factors for inadequate preparation have not included large numbers of African Americans. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of inadequate bowel preparation on initial and follow-up colonoscopy in a large, racially diverse patient population.

Methods: Colonoscopies performed during a 1-year period were analyzed retrospectively. Factors including age, sex, race, and start time were recorded. Patient ZIP codes were linked to census data to estimate education and income. For examinations with inadequate bowel preparations, we collected data on recommendations and the preparation quality of follow-up procedures.

Results: We included 3741 patients (40.2% African American). Of these, 66.9% had adequate bowel preparation and 33.1% had inadequate bowel preparation. African Americans had the highest prevalence of inadequate preparations at 43.0%. African American race was a predictor of inadequate bowel preparation, despite controlling for education and income. Age, male sex, and procedure taking place after 12 pm also were risk factors for inadequate preparation. Receipt of specific preparation instructions on the endoscopy report did not affect preparation quality on follow-up examination. Our study found a high rate (33.1%) of inadequate bowel preparations, and African American race was found to be an independent risk factor for inadequate preparation. We validated previously reported risk factors including age, male sex, and later procedure time. Finally, we noted high rates of inadequate preparation on follow-up examinations.

Conclusions: Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation is important for colorectal cancer prevention, especially in high-risk populations such as African Americans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The other authors have no financial relationships to disclose and no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig
Fig
Distribution of follow-up recommendations made for individuals who had inadequate preparations on index colonoscopy. Of the 1240 patients with inadequate bowel preparations, 742 (59.9%) were given a specific follow-up interval, with the majority in the 3- to 5-year category.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. - PubMed
    1. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384. - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1696–1700. - PubMed
    1. Lebwohl B, Wang TC, Neugut AI. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:2014–2020. - PubMed
    1. Shah N, Sanaka MR, Mullen KD, et al. Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates compared to morning colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;60:2726–2730. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms