Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Sep:66:123-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 15.

Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial

Caitlin C Murphy  1 , Sally W Vernon  2 , Nicole M Haddock  1 , Melissa L Anderson  3 , Jessica Chubak  3 , Beverly B Green  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial

Caitlin C Murphy et al. Prev Med. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Few studies use longitudinal data to identify predictors of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS). We examined predictors of (1) initial CRCS during the first year of a randomized trial, and (2) repeat CRCS during the second year of the trial among those that completed FOBT in Year 1.

Methods: The sample comprised 1247 participants of the Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening (SOS) Trial (Group Health Cooperative, August 2008 to November 2011). Potential predictors of CRCS were identified with logistic regression and included sociodemographics, health history, and validated scales of psychosocial constructs.

Results: Prior CRCS (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.99-3.52) and intervention group (Automated: OR 2.06 95% CI 1.43-2.95; Assisted: OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.69-6.03; Navigated: OR 5.64, 95% CI 3.74-8.49) were predictors of CRCS completion at Year 1. For repeat CRCS at Year 2, prior CRCS at baseline (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.25-3.11), intervention group (Automated: OR 9.27, 95% CI 4.56-18.82; Assisted: OR 11.17, 95% CI 5.44-22.94; Navigated: OR 13.10, 95% CI 6.33-27.08), and self-efficacy (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.00-1.73) were significant predictors.

Conclusion: Self-efficacy and prior CRCS are important predictors of future screening behavior. CRCS completion increased when access barriers were removed through interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00697047.

Keywords: Behavioral intervention research; Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Longitudinal study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bastani R, Maxwell AE, Bradford C. Cross-section versus prospective predictors of screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5(10):845–848. - PubMed
    1. Breslau N, Reeb KG. Continuity of care in a university-based practice. J. Med. Educ. 1975;50(10):965–969. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention (CDC) Cancer screening—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2012;61(3):41–45. - PubMed
    1. Church TR, Yeazel MW, Jones RM, Kochevar LK, Watt GD, Mongin SJ, et al. A randomized trial of direct mailing of fecal occult blood tests to increase colorectal cancer screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004;96(10):770–780. - PubMed
    1. Coronado GD, Golovaty I, Longton G, Levy L, Jimenez R. Effectiveness of a clinic-based colorectal cancer screening promotion program for underserved Hispanics. Cancer. 2011;117(8):1745–1754. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data