Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun 17;6(8):a017566.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017566.

Sexual conflict, life span, and aging

Affiliations
Review

Sexual conflict, life span, and aging

Margo I Adler et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. .

Abstract

The potential for sexual conflict to influence the evolution of life span and aging has been recognized for more than a decade, and recent work also suggests that variation in life span and aging can influence sexually antagonistic coevolution. However, empirical exploration of these ideas is only beginning. Here, we provide an overview of the ideas and evidence linking inter- and intralocus sexual conflicts with life span and aging. We aim to clarify the conceptual basis of this research program, examine the current state of knowledge, and suggest key questions for further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
In a “typical” mating system involving stronger sexual competition among males and greater investment in offspring among females, the sexes tend to encounter different “opportunity landscapes” that generate sex-specific selection on longevity and aging rate. (A) Females can gain fitness only in relatively small increments (small apples), by accumulating resources and converting those resources into offspring. In contrast, males have greater opportunity for large, short-term fitness gain (large apples) through mating. (B) Thus, for males, large, short-term investments in reproduction (including strategies that involve high risk of injury or death) may be favored by selection because such investments may result in large fitness payoffs. In contrast, females cannot gain equally large short-term fitness payoffs and may therefore be selected to pursue relatively safe, long-term strategies involving greater risk avoidance and larger investment in somatic maintenance.

References

    1. Adkins-Regan E 2005. Hormones and animal social behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
    1. Adler M 2010. Sexual conflict in waterfowl: Why do females resist extra-pair copulations? Behav Ecol 21: 182–192
    1. Adler MI, Bonduriansky R 2011. The dissimilar costs of love and war: Age-specific mortality as a function of the operational sex ratio. J Evol Biol 24: 1169–1177 - PubMed
    1. Adler MI, Cassidy EJ, Fricke C, Bonduriansky R 2013. The lifespan-reproduction trade-off under dietary restriction is sex-specific and context-dependent. Exp Gerontol 48: 539–548 - PubMed
    1. Andersson M 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources