Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr;56(2):222-33.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu050. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

The Seniors' Outdoor Survey: An Observational Tool for Assessing Outdoor Environments at Long-Term Care Settings

Susan Rodiek  1 , Adeleh Nejati  2 , Eric Bardenhagen  3 , Chanam Lee  3 , Giulio Senes  4
Affiliations
Review

The Seniors' Outdoor Survey: An Observational Tool for Assessing Outdoor Environments at Long-Term Care Settings

Susan Rodiek et al. Gerontologist. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of the study: To describe the development and psychometric testing of the Seniors' Outdoor Survey (SOS), an instrument for evaluating how well the outdoor space in a long-term care setting supports the preferences and outdoor usage of residents.

Design and methods: Content validity of the main SOS items initially was based on relevant literature and preliminary studies in diverse long-term care settings. After conducting a multiregional pilot study with 152 outdoor spaces at 68 assisted living facilities, the instrument was substantially revised and tested for interrater and test-retest reliability with 22 outdoor spaces at 12 long-term care settings, using 2 raters. Validity was examined using content analysis of resident survey responses (N = 1,128) from the multiregional study and specific item validation by subject matter experts (N = 53).

Results: The final instrument contains 60 ratable items organized in 5 domains: access to nature (14 items), outdoor comfort and safety (15 items), walking and outdoor activities (14 items), indoor-outdoor connection (11 items), and connection to the world (6 items). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates of interrater reliability were .91 for the overall instrument, ranging from .83 to .98 for the 5 domains. Interrater reliability (ICC) was above .70 for more than 79% of individual items. Test-retest reliability (ICC) was .92, ranging from .81 to .98 for domains.

Implications: The SOS tool fills a gap in the available environmental assessment instruments, providing a reliable way for researchers, providers, and designers to evaluate and compare the supportive potential of outdoor spaces for long-term care residents.

Keywords: Access to nature; Environmental assessment instrument; Long-term care residents; Outdoor usage; Reliability; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Access to Nature for Older Adults. (2014). College Station, TX: Center for Health Systems & Design, Colleges of Architecture and Medicine, Texas A&M University; Retrieved from www.accesstonature.org
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2007). Environmental scan of instruments to inform consumer choice in assisted living facilities. Retrieved October 26, 2013, from http://www.ahrq.gov/legacy/research/ltcscan/ltcappa.pdf
    1. Anastasi A. (1988). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
    1. Anderzhon J. W. Fraley I. L., & Green M (2007). Design for aging: Post-occupancy evaluations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Barnicle T., & Midden K. S (2003). The effects of a horticulture activity program on the psychological well-being of older people in a long-term care facility. HortTechnology, 13, 81–85.

Publication types

MeSH terms