Determining a diagnostic cut-off on the Teate Depression Inventory
- PMID: 24940062
- PMCID: PMC4051735
- DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S55706
Determining a diagnostic cut-off on the Teate Depression Inventory
Abstract
A small but growing body of literature suggests that the Teate Depression Inventory (TDI) may be an "objective" measure of depression compared with other commonly used scales. Furthermore, the TDI has strong psychometric properties in both clinical and nonclinical samples. The present study aimed to extend the use of TDI by identifying cut-off scores that could differentiate varying levels of depression severity in a group of clinically diagnosed depression disorder patients (N=125). Three receiver operating characteristic curve analyses indicated cut-off scores of 21 (sensitivity =0.86, specificity =0.94, and classification accuracy =0.90); 36 (sensitivity =0.84, specificity =0.96, and classification accuracy =0.92); and 50 (sensitivity =0.81, specificity =0.93, and classification accuracy =0.90), for minimal, mild, moderate, and severe depression, respectively. Results suggest that the TDI measures depression severity across a broad range with high test accuracy and may be appropriately used to screen for depression.
Keywords: ROC curve; Rasch analysis; depression screening; major depression; self-report scales.
Figures
References
-
- Widiger TA, Coker LA. Mental disorders as discrete clinical conditions: Dimensional versus categorical classification. In: Hersen M, Turner SM, editors. Adult psychopathology and diagnosis. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2003. pp. 3–35.
-
- Widiger TA, Samuel DB. Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – fifth edition. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114(4):494–504. - PubMed
-
- Frances A, Mack AH, First MB, et al. DSM-IV meets philosophy. J Med Philos. 1994;19(3):207–218. - PubMed
-
- Flett G, Vredenburg K, Krames L. The continuity of depression in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychol Bull. 1997;121(3):395–416. - PubMed
-
- Kraemer HC, Noda A, O’Hara R. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatr Res. 2004;38(1):17–25. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
