Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun;21(3):e466-79.
doi: 10.3747/co.21.1781.

Survivorship care plans: a work in progress

H M L Daudt  1 , C van Mossel  2 , D L Dennis  1 , L Leitz  3 , H C Watson  4 , J J Tanliao  5
Affiliations
Review

Survivorship care plans: a work in progress

H M L Daudt et al. Curr Oncol. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Health agencies across the world have echoed the recommendation of the U.S. Institute of Medicine (iom) that survivorship care plans (scps) should be provided to patients upon completion of treatment. To date, reviews of scps have been limited to the United States. The present review offers an expanded scope and describes how scps are being designed, delivered, and evaluated in various countries.

Methods: We collected scps from Canada, the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. We selected for analysis the scps for which we could obtain the actual scp, information about the delivery approach, and evaluation data. We conducted a content analysis and compared the scps with the iom guidelines.

Results: Of 47 scps initially identified, 16 were analyzed. The scps incorporated several of the iom's guidelines, but many did not include psychosocial services, identification of a key point of contact, genetic testing, and financial concerns. The model of delivery instituted by the U.K. National Cancer Survivorship Initiative stands out because of its unique approach that initiates care planning at diagnosis and stratifies patients into a follow-up program based on self-management capacities.

Summary: There is considerable variation in the approach to delivery and the extent to which scps follow the original recommendations from the iom. We discuss the implications of this review for future care-planning programs and prospective research. A holistic approach to care that goes beyond the iom recommendations and that incorporates care planning from the point of diagnosis to beyond completion of treatment might improve people's experience of cancer care.

Keywords: Supportive care; survivorship; survivorship care plans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow of survivorship care plan (scp) search strategies and inclusion decisions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
    1. Reuben SH. Living Beyond Cancer: Finding a New Balance: President’s Cancer Panel 2003–2004 Annual Report. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2004.
    1. Canadian Cancer Society’s Steering Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2012. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2012.
    1. Macmillan Cancer Support. National Cancer Survivorship Initiative [Web page] London, U.K.: Macmillan Cancer Support; 2012. [Available at: http://www.ncsi.org.uk/; cited October 5, 2012]

LinkOut - more resources