Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99825.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099825. eCollection 2014.

ClinicalCodes: an online clinical codes repository to improve the validity and reproducibility of research using electronic medical records

Affiliations

ClinicalCodes: an online clinical codes repository to improve the validity and reproducibility of research using electronic medical records

David A Springate et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Lists of clinical codes are the foundation for research undertaken using electronic medical records (EMRs). If clinical code lists are not available, reviewers are unable to determine the validity of research, full study replication is impossible, researchers are unable to make effective comparisons between studies, and the construction of new code lists is subject to much duplication of effort. Despite this, the publication of clinical codes is rarely if ever a requirement for obtaining grants, validating protocols, or publishing research. In a representative sample of 450 EMR primary research articles indexed on PubMed, we found that only 19 (5.1%) were accompanied by a full set of published clinical codes and 32 (8.6%) stated that code lists were available on request. To help address these problems, we have built an online repository where researchers using EMRs can upload and download lists of clinical codes. The repository will enable clinical researchers to better validate EMR studies, build on previous code lists and compare disease definitions across studies. It will also assist health informaticians in replicating database studies, tracking changes in disease definitions or clinical coding practice through time and sharing clinical code information across platforms and data sources as research objects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of UK Primary Care Database publications.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Screenshot of the ClinicalCodes website showing articles with uploaded code lists.

References

    1. Purves IN (1996) The paperless general practice. BMJ 312: 1112–1113. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, et al. (2009) Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine 360: 1628–1638. - PubMed
    1. Herrett E, Thomas SL, Schoonen WM, Smeeth L, Hall AJ (2010) Validation and validity of diagnoses in the general practice research database: a systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 69: 4–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jordan K, Porcheret M, Croft P (2004) Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Family Practice 21: 396–412. - PubMed
    1. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y, Robson J, Brindle P (2008) Performance of the qrisk cardiovascular risk prediction algorithm in an independent uk sample of patients from general practice: a validation study. Heart 94: 34–39. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources