To drain or not to drain elective uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has largely replaced conventional cholecystectomy in the past decade. However, there are still limited data about the value of prophylactic sub-hepatic drainage for elective uncomplicated LC. We carried out a systematic review of the literature in order to perform a meta-analysis about this issue. An unrestricted search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library up to 31 December 2013 was performed. Overall, seven high-methodological quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis, resulting in 1310 patients totally. The incidence of abdominal collections, wound infection and overall mortality according to the presence or absence of the sub-hepatic drainage were meta-analyzed. Sub-hepatic drainage showed an increase in the abdominal collection rate in patients who underwent elective uncomplicated LC (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.00-2.43) if compared to patients without drainage. A non-significant correlation was found in overall mortality and infection rates. The meta-analysis shows that the presence of the sub-hepatic drainage does not reduce the incidence of abdominal collection after uncomplicated LC, whereas it does not influence wound infection and mortality rates, postoperative pain and hospital stay.

Keywords: Cholecystectomy; Drain; Laparoscopic; Meta-analysis.