Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Nov;66(11):1653-61.
doi: 10.1002/acr.22384.

Subcutaneous tocilizumab versus placebo in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Clinical Trial

Subcutaneous tocilizumab versus placebo in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Alan Kivitz et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Nov.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) versus subcutaneous placebo (PBO-SC) was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the BREVACTA study.

Methods: Patients (n = 656) were randomized 2:1 to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg every other week or PBO-SC every other week for 24 weeks; 20% previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment. Escape therapy with TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly was offered from week 12 for inadequate response. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 24. The key secondary outcomes were radiographic progression and safety.

Results: TCZ-SC was superior to PBO-SC for ACR20 response at week 24 (60.9% versus 31.5%; P < 0.0001). All secondary end points showed TCZ-SC to be superior to PBO-SC, including ACR50 and ACR70 response (40% and 20% for TCZ-SC, respectively, and 12% and 5% for PBO-SC, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both) and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) remission (DAS28 <2.6; 32% versus 4% [P < 0.0001]). The mean change in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score was significantly lower in the TCZ-SC group than the PBO-SC group (0.62 versus 1.23; P = 0.0149). Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were comparable between the TCZ-SC and PBO-SC groups; 4.6% and 3.7% of patients had at least 1 SAE, respectively, and infection was the most common SAE in 2.1% and 1.8% of patients, respectively. More injection site reactions occurred with TCZ-SC than PBO-SC (7.1% versus 4.1%). No anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity reactions occurred. There were 3 deaths in the TCZ-SC group and 0 in the PBO-SC group.

Conclusion: TCZ-SC every other week had significantly greater efficacy, including ACR end points and inhibition of joint damage, compared with PBO-SC. TCZ-SC was well tolerated and its safety profile was comparable with that of previous intravenous TCZ studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01232569.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition over 24 weeks. TCZ-SC = subcutaneous tocilizumab; q2w = every other week; DMARDs = disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; PBO-SC = subcutaneous placebo.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disease activity, physical function, and radiographic outcomes at 24 weeks for patients in the intent-to-treat population. A, The proportion of patients treated with either subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC; n = 437) or placebo (PBO-SC; n = 219) every other week (q2w) who achieved the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), 50% improvement (ACR50), and 70% improvement (ACR70) at week 24. B, The proportion of patients who achieved remission based on the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (<2.6) at week 24. C, The mean change from baseline in the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (mTSS) every other week.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The proportion of patients treated with either subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC; n = 437) or placebo (PBO-SC; n = 219) every other week (q2w) who achieved the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), 50% improvement (ACR50), and 70% improvement (ACR70) at week 24, stratified by weight (intent-to-treat population).

References

    1. Smolen JS, Beaulieu A, Rubbert-Roth A, Ramos-Remus C, Rovensky J, Alecock E, et al. Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371:98–97. - PubMed
    1. Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Moreland LW, Weisman MH, Birbara CA, et al. Adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:35–45. - PubMed
    1. Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Bankhurst AD, Bulpitt KJ, Fleischmann RM, Fox RI, et al. A trial of etanercept, a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor: Fc fusion protein, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:253–9. - PubMed
    1. Maini R, St Clair EW, Breedveld F, Furst D, Kalden J, Weisman M ATTRACT Study Group. Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 1999;354:1932–9. - PubMed
    1. Edwards JC, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, FilipowiczSosnowska A, Emery P, Close DR, et al. Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2572–81. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data