Volumetric change in interbody bone graft after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a prospective study
- PMID: 24943640
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3410-z
Volumetric change in interbody bone graft after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a prospective study
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to quantify the change in the volume of the interbody bone graft after the PLIF and monitor the change over time for subsequent analysis.
Methods: The 114 cases were selected as the subjects of this study. The observation period was for 5 years following the surgery. The volume of the bone graft in the interbody space was calculated by summing up the cross-sectional area of the bone graft on each axial image multiplied by the height (2 mm) (the volume of the two cages was excluded). The volume ratio (%) = (bone graft volume)/(total volume of the interbody space - cage volume) was used for the purpose of evaluation.
Results: The volumetric change of the bone graft was 51 % (3 months), 53 % (6 months), 54 % (1 year), 55 % (2 years), 59 % (3 years), 62 % (4 years), and 72 % (5 years), indicating a continued increase up to the 5-year mark. In particular, a significant increase was observed from the second year as compared with the previous years' result. Additionally, the volumetric increase from the second year to the fifth year was significantly higher than that before the second year.
Conclusions: The post-PLIF volumes of interbody bone grafts exhibited increases particularly from the second to fifth years after the procedure. Even the elderly and those with poor bone qualities can expect to have volumetric increases over time. Sufficient interbody space should be secured for accommodating bone grafts by intraoperative reduction, wherever possible.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up.Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Sep;42(3):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01114-3. Epub 2019 May 29. Neurosurg Rev. 2019. PMID: 31144195
-
Use of an autologous cortical bone graft sandwiched between two intervertebral spacers in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.Neurosurg Rev. 2001 Jul;24(2-3):119-22. doi: 10.1007/pl00012394. Neurosurg Rev. 2001. PMID: 11485232 Clinical Trial.
-
Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study.Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1158-63. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2593-4. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23361529 Free PMC article.
-
Double-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: A retrospective study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 16;13(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0723-3. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29548343 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Sep;26(8):2057-66. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005. PMID: 16155160 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Comparative effectiveness of two different interbody fusion methods for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cage versus morselized impacted bone grafts.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Aug 19;16:207. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0675-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015. PMID: 26285579 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of Ti/PEEK Versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):472-478. doi: 10.1177/21925682211000323. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Global Spine J. 2023. PMID: 33733888 Free PMC article.
-
Pedicle screw-rod fixation: a feasible treatment for dogs with severe degenerative lumbosacral stenosis.BMC Vet Res. 2015 Dec 7;11:299. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0614-3. BMC Vet Res. 2015. PMID: 26642756 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis.Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2095-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06002-4. Epub 2019 Jun 7. Eur Spine J. 2019. PMID: 31175483
-
A Long-Term Follow-up, Multicenter, Comparative Study of the Radiologic, and Clinical Results Between a CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 Bioactive Glass Ceramics (BGS-7) Intervertebral Spacer and Titanium Cage in 1-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;33(7):E322-E329. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000950. Clin Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32080009 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical