Appetite control and biomarkers of satiety with vegetarian (soy) and meat-based high-protein diets for weight loss in obese men: a randomized crossover trial
- PMID: 24944057
- DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.077503
Appetite control and biomarkers of satiety with vegetarian (soy) and meat-based high-protein diets for weight loss in obese men: a randomized crossover trial
Abstract
Background: There is limited evidence with regard to the effect of different sources of protein on appetite during weight loss. Vegetarian and meat-based high-protein diets may have contrasting effects on appetite and biomarkers of protein-induced satiety.
Objective: The aim was to assess appetite response to meat or vegetarian high-protein weight-loss (HPWL) diets in obese men to monitor plasma amino acid profile and gut peptide response as potential satiety biomarkers.
Design: Twenty obese [body mass index (in kg/m²): 34.8] men participated in a dietary intervention study. After 3 d of a maintenance diet, they were provided in a crossover design with either a vegetarian HPWL (Soy-HPWL) or a meat-based HPWL (Meat-HPWL) diet for 2 wk. Both diets comprised 30% protein, 30% fat, and 40% carbohydrate, provided to measured resting metabolic rate. Body weight and the motivation to eat were measured daily. Plasma satiety biomarkers were collected during a test-meal challenge (5 h) at the end of each diet period.
Results: Over the 2 wk, subjects lost, on average, 2.41 and 2.27 kg with consumption of the Soy- and Meat-HPWL diets, respectively [P = 0.352; SE of the difference (SED): 0.1]. ANOVA confirmed that subjectively rated hunger (P = 0.569; SED: 3.8), fullness (P = 0.404; SED: 4.1), desire to eat (P = 0.356; SED: 3.7), preservation of lean body mass (P = 0.334; SED: 0.2), and loss of percentage fat mass (P = 0.179; SED: 0.2) did not differ between the 2 HPWL diets. There were differences in absolute concentrations of ghrelin and peptide YY between the 2 HPWL diets, although the response as net area under the curve was not different.
Conclusions: Appetite control and weight loss were similar for both HPWL diets. Gut hormone profile was similar between the diets, which suggests that vegetarian diets can be as effective as meat-based diets for appetite control during weight loss.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02080325.
© 2014 American Society for Nutrition.
Similar articles
-
Consuming Beef vs. Soy Protein Has Little Effect on Appetite, Satiety, and Food Intake in Healthy Adults.J Nutr. 2015 May;145(5):1010-6. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.206987. Epub 2015 Mar 25. J Nutr. 2015. PMID: 25809680 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Dietary Protein Source and Quantity during Weight Loss on Appetite, Energy Expenditure, and Cardio-Metabolic Responses.Nutrients. 2016 Jan 26;8(2):63. doi: 10.3390/nu8020063. Nutrients. 2016. PMID: 26821042 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of a high-protein ketogenic diet on hunger, appetite, and weight loss in obese men feeding ad libitum.Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jan;87(1):44-55. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.1.44. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008. PMID: 18175736 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of short- and long-term protein consumption on appetite and appetite-regulating gastrointestinal hormones, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Physiol Behav. 2020 Nov 1;226:113123. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113123. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Physiol Behav. 2020. PMID: 32768415
-
Plant-Based Diet: Is It as Good as an Animal-Based Diet When It Comes to Protein?Curr Nutr Rep. 2022 Jun;11(2):337-346. doi: 10.1007/s13668-022-00401-8. Epub 2022 Feb 22. Curr Nutr Rep. 2022. PMID: 35194768 Review.
Cited by
-
The health effects of soy: A reference guide for health professionals.Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 11;9:970364. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.970364. eCollection 2022. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 36034914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Meals based on vegetable protein sources (beans and peas) are more satiating than meals based on animal protein sources (veal and pork) - a randomized cross-over meal test study.Food Nutr Res. 2016 Oct 19;60:32634. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v60.32634. eCollection 2016. Food Nutr Res. 2016. PMID: 27765144 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the Cholesterol-Lowering Effect of Soy Protein: A Review of the Effects of Dietary Soy and Its Constituents on Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease.Nutrients. 2017 Mar 24;9(4):324. doi: 10.3390/nu9040324. Nutrients. 2017. PMID: 28338639 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consuming Beef vs. Soy Protein Has Little Effect on Appetite, Satiety, and Food Intake in Healthy Adults.J Nutr. 2015 May;145(5):1010-6. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.206987. Epub 2015 Mar 25. J Nutr. 2015. PMID: 25809680 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Plant Versus Animal Protein on Muscle Mass, Strength, Physical Performance, and Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Nutr Rev. 2025 Jul 1;83(7):e1581-e1603. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae200. Nutr Rev. 2025. PMID: 39813010 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical