Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Nov;64(9):646-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2003.11.003.

Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in the context of other contemporary fluoroquinolones: a review

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in the context of other contemporary fluoroquinolones: a review

Peter Ball. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 Nov.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, fluoroquinolone research has focused on achieving several goals, including (1) enhanced potency against gram-positive cocci, notably Streptococcus pneumoniae, and anaerobes, while (2) maintaining potency against gram-negative pathogens, (3) optimizing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and (4) minimizing potential adverse drug reactions through recognition and avoidance of structural configurations that have characterized earlier, reactive compounds.

Objective: This review examines the efficacy and safety of fluoroquinolones and the specific clinical evidence regarding levofloxacin.

Methods: Using published literature collected over time by the author, a review was conducted, focusing on the efficacy and safety profile of levofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones.

Results: The newer fluoroquinolones have fulfilled many of the research goals described above. Levofloxacin has improved anti-gram-positive potency, PK/PD properties, a proven clinical trial record (particularly for communityacquired pneumonia [CAP]), and an excellent safety profile-in the context of the treatment of >250 million patients worldwide in the past decade. It is licensed for management of drug-resistant S pneumoniae infections in the United States and has gained widespread formulary acceptance and guideline inclusion. Studies assessing levofloxacin for CAP therapy show significant advantages over standard therapy, such as trends toward reduced IV therapy and length of hospitalization, reduced mortality, and significant associated cost reduction. In addition, levofloxacin has proved highly effective in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), with excellent clinical and bacteriologic results, typical of the class, and significant advantages-in terms of clinical response, overall pathogen eradication, extension of the symptom-free period, and trends toward a reduction in the number of consultation visits and hospitalizations-over standard agents, such as the oral cephalosporins.

Conclusions: Levofloxacin offers a combination of documented efficacy and tolerability, and provides an important option for the treatment of bacterial infections, including CAP and AECB, compared with standard agents used in the management of lower respiratory tract infections.

Keywords: acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis; community-acquired pneumonia; fluoroquinolones; gram-positive bacteria; nosocomial pneumonia; resistance; respiratory tract infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ball P. The quinolones: History and overview. In: Andriole V.T., editor. The Quinolones. 3rd ed. Academic Press; San Diego, Calif: 2000. pp. 1–31.
    1. Ball P., Fernald A., Tillotson G. Therapeutic advances of new fluoroquinolones. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1998;7:761–783. - PubMed
    1. Ball P. Quinolone-induced QT interval prolongation: A not-so-unexpected class effect. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45:557–559. - PubMed
    1. Ball P., Mandell L. Treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. In: Hooper D.C., Rubinstein E., editors. Quinolone Antimicrobial Agents. 3rd ed. American Society of Microbiology Press; Washington, DC: 2003.
    1. Ball P. Future of the quinolones. Semin Respir Infect. 2001;16:215–224. - PubMed