Self-reported versus actual weight and height data contribute to different weight misperception classifications
- PMID: 24945166
- PMCID: PMC4141645
- DOI: 10.14423/01.SMJ.0000450708.52011.7c
Self-reported versus actual weight and height data contribute to different weight misperception classifications
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to examine potential differences between two approaches to defining adolescent weight misperception. Specifically, weight status perception was compared with self-reported weight status and actual weight status (based on body mass index percentiles calculated from self-reported and actual weights and heights, respectively). Furthermore, the accuracy of assigning weight status based on body mass index percentiles calculated from self-reported weights and heights was assessed by comparing them with actual weight status.
Methods: Data were extracted from Team Up for Healthy Living, an 8-week, school-based obesity prevention program in southern Appalachia. Participants (N = 1509) were predominately white (93.4%) and ninth graders (89.5%), with approximately equivalent representation of both sexes (50.7% boys).
Results: The study revealed significant differences between the approaches to defining weight misperception (χ(2) = 16.2; P = 0.0003).
Conclusions: Researchers should interpret study findings with awareness of potential differences based on the method of calculating weight misperception.
References
-
- Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998;101:518–525. - PubMed
-
- Griffiths LJ, Parsons TJ, Hill AJ. Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5:282–304. - PubMed
-
- Wolf AM, Colditz GA. Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obes Res. 1998;6:97–106. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical