Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;17(5):443-50.
doi: 10.1111/ner.12197. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome

Stefan Schu  1 , Philipp J Slotty, Gregor Bara, Monika von Knop, Deborah Edgar, Jan Vesper
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome

Stefan Schu et al. Neuromodulation. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of chronic pain is a well-established therapy. However, the requirement that paresthesia be continually felt by the patient has important downsides. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a new paresthesia-free SCS paradigm, called burst stimulation, for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design.

Materials and methods: Twenty patients with FBSS and a preexisting SCS system each received three treatment allocations in random order for a period of one week: 500-Hz tonic stimulation, burst stimulation, and placebo stimulation. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were pain quality measured using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ) and safety. Additional data were collected relating to pain-related disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Results: The lowest mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were observed under burst stimulation. For the burst stimulation treatment group, mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were significantly decreased compared with the other treatment groups. Mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were not significantly different between 500-Hz tonic stimulation and placebo stimulation. Although the lowest mean ODI score was observed under burst stimulation, no significant differences were found between the ODI categories. No adverse events occurred, and burst stimulation was significantly preferred by 16 patients (80%).

Conclusions: Overall, burst stimulation resulted in significantly better pain relief and improved pain quality in the short term compared with 500-Hz tonic stimulation and placebo stimulation and was preferred by the majority of patients.

Keywords: Burst stimulation; failed back surgery syndrome; neurostimulation; spinal cord stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types