Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;19(3):240-5.

Aftercare services for patients with severe mental disorder: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Aftercare services for patients with severe mental disorder: A randomized controlled trial

Majid Barekatain et al. J Res Med Sci. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although evidences emphasize on the importance of aftercare programs to achieve continuity of care, different studies have revealed controversial results about the outcome. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of aftercare program on outcome measures of patients with severe mental disorders.

Materials and methods: Of a total 123 eligible patients with severe mental disorders, 61 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 62 patients to the control group. The interventions included follow-up phone calls, home visits, and psychoeducation for families. Assessments were performed on hospital admission, discharge and the following 3(rd), 6(th) and 12(th) month. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHO-QOL) were used. Data were analyzed through Chi square, t-test, Mann-Whitney-U, and Repeated Measures Analysis of Co-Variance.

Results: Mean of the HDRS scores revealed significant difference between the two groups when HDRS scores on the admission day were controlled (P = 0.028). The level of functioning was significantly different between the two groups based on the sequential assessments of GAF (P = 0.040). One year after the onset of trial, the number of psychiatric readmissions were significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.036).

Conclusion: Readmission rates could be reduced by aftercare services, through the first year, after discharge of patients with severe mental disorders. On the other hand, higher levels of functioning would be expected after one year.

Keywords: Aftercare services; global assessment functioning; mental disorders; quality of life; readmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in the mean CGIS scores of each group during the course of the study
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in the mean HDRS scores of intervention and control groups during the course of the study
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes of mean PANSS score in intervention and control groups during the course of the study
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in the mean YMRS score in intervention and control groups during the course of the study
Figure 5
Figure 5
Changes in the mean GAF scores of each group during the course of the study
Figure 6
Figure 6
Changes in the mean QOL scores of intervention and control groups during the course of the study

References

    1. Geneva: [Last accessed on 2012]. World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease 2004 Update. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004updat... .
    1. Baxter AJ, Charlson FJ, Somerville AJ, Whiteford HA. Mental disorders as risk factors: Assessing the evidence for the Global Burden Of Disease Study. BMC Med. 2011;9:134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Measuring the global burden of disease and risk factors, 1990-2001. In: Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ, editors. Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2006. pp. 1–13.
    1. Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Danaei G, Rodgers A, Mathers CD, et al. Comparative quantification of mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected risk factors. In: Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL, editors. Global burden of disease and risk factors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. pp. 241–68. - PubMed
    1. Tunstall-Pedoe H. WHO Global Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. Preventing Chronic Diseases. A Vital Investment; p. 200.