Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process
- PMID: 24949144
- PMCID: PMC4054739
- DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1
Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process
Abstract
Background: The recruitment of skilled candidates into internal medicine residency programs has relied on traditional interviewing techniques with varying degrees of success. The development of simulated medical technology has provided a new arena in which to assess candidates' clinical skills, knowledge base, situational awareness, and problem-solving dexterities within a standardized environment for educational and assessment purposes.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the interest of program candidates in incorporating simulation medicine into the internal medicine residency interview process.
Methods: As a prospective, survey-based analysis, potential candidates who completed an interview between October 2012 and January 2013 with an accredited internal medicine residency program were sent a postmatch survey that incorporated 3 additional questions relating to their prior experience with medical simulation and their views on incorporating the technology into the interview format.
Results: Of the 88 candidates who completed an interview, 92% (n = 81) were scheduled to graduate medical school in 2013 and were graduates of a US medical school. All survey responders described previous experience with medical simulation. Fifty-eight percent (n = 51) of responders described being "less likely" to interview with or join a residency program if they were required to participate in a 10-minute medical simulation during the interview process.
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that despite the increasing role of technology in medical education, its role in high-stakes evaluations (such as residency interviews) requires further maturation before general acceptance by residency candidates can be expected.
Similar articles
-
Applicants' Interview Experience of Family Medicine Residency Match: Reflections from a Quality Improvement Initiative at a Community Hospital.Cureus. 2020 Oct 20;12(10):e11054. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11054. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33101791 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of Behavioral Interviewing Performance With Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicant Characteristics☆?>J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):954-958. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16. J Surg Educ. 2016. PMID: 27321984
-
Incorporating multiple mini-interviews in the postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency program selection process.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Feb 15;71(4):297-304. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130315. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014. PMID: 24481154
-
Residency Applicant Perceptions of Multiple Mini Interviews in Post-Graduate Year 1 Residency Interviews.Innov Pharm. 2022 Dec 12;13(2):10.24926/iip.v13i2.4806. doi: 10.24926/iip.v13i2.4806. eCollection 2022. Innov Pharm. 2022. PMID: 36654716 Free PMC article.
-
A communication assessment and skill-building exercise (CASE) for first-year residents.Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):746-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00035. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12114167
Cited by
-
Factors important to anesthesiology residency applicants during recruitment.J Educ Perioper Med. 2017 Apr 1;19(2):E604. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017. PMID: 28824937 Free PMC article.
-
The feasibility of simulation-based high-stakes assessment in emergency medicine settings: A scoping review.J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Nov 30;10:441. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1127_20. eCollection 2021. J Educ Health Promot. 2021. PMID: 35071647 Free PMC article.
-
Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Jun;13(3):355-370. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01381.1. Epub 2021 Jun 14. J Grad Med Educ. 2021. PMID: 34178261 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Momen N. The effects of alternative input devices and repeated exposures on the Test of Basic Aviation Skills (TBAS) performance. Mil Med. 2009;174(12):1282–1286. - PubMed
-
- Razack S, Faremo S, Drolet F, Snell L, Wiseman J, Pickering J. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison. Med Educ. 2009;43(10):993–1000. - PubMed
-
- Institue of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2000. http://www.iom.edu/∼/media/Files/Report%20Files/1999/To-Err-is-Human/To%.... Accessed July 12, 2013.
-
- Cannon K, Hartsell Z, Chang Y, Wu Q. Perceptions of nurse practitioner and physician assistant interview candidates regarding the incorporation of simulated medical scenarios into the hiring process for hospital-based positions. Society of Hospital Medicine: 2013 RIV Abstract Issue, Vol 8, May 2013 Abstract Supplement.
-
- Gale T, Roberts M, Sice P. Predictive validity of a selection centre testing non-technical skills for recruitment to training in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(5):603–609. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials