Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 10:2:e437.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.437. eCollection 2014.

How male sound pressure level influences phonotaxis in virgin female Jamaican field crickets (Gryllus assimilis)

Affiliations

How male sound pressure level influences phonotaxis in virgin female Jamaican field crickets (Gryllus assimilis)

Karen Pacheco et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Understanding female mate preference is important for determining the strength and direction of sexual trait evolution. The sound pressure level (SPL) acoustic signalers use is often an important predictor of mating success because higher sound pressure levels are detectable at greater distances. If females are more attracted to signals produced at higher sound pressure levels, then the potential fitness impacts of signalling at higher sound pressure levels should be elevated beyond what would be expected from detection distance alone. Here we manipulated the sound pressure level of cricket mate attraction signals to determine how female phonotaxis was influenced. We examined female phonotaxis using two common experimental methods: spherical treadmills and open arenas. Both methods showed similar results, with females exhibiting greatest phonotaxis towards loud sound pressure levels relative to the standard signal (69 vs. 60 dB SPL) but showing reduced phonotaxis towards very loud sound pressure level signals relative to the standard (77 vs. 60 dB SPL). Reduced female phonotaxis towards supernormal stimuli may signify an acoustic startle response, an absence of other required sensory cues, or perceived increases in predation risk.

Keywords: Age; Amplitude; Female preference; Gryllus assimilis; Kramer spherical treadmill; Locomotion compensator; Loudness; Phonotaxis; Teleogryllus; Trackball.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Female phonotaxis under different sound pressure levels on the spherical treadmill.
Phonotaxis was quantified using net vector scores (net movement toward or away from the focal signal; direct movement towards the focal speaker resulted in positive vector scores while direct movement away from the focal speaker resulted in negative vector scores). Letters represent significant differences across sound pressure levels (Tukey’s post-hoc HSD analysis). Asterisks represent significant differences between the focal and standard signal (above median = phonotaxis toward focal signal; below median = phonotaxis toward standard signal). Box plots: horizontal line within each box = median phonotaxis measure; top of each box = 3rd (75%) quartile phonotaxis measure; bottom of each box = 1st (25%) quartile phonotaxis measure; whiskers represent the outermost data point that falls within the distances 1st quartile – 1.5*interquartile range or 3rd quartile + 1.5*interquartile range; whiskers are determined by the upper and lower data point values (excluding outliers) when the data points do not reach the above computed ranges; light grey dots represent outliers, when present.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Female phonotaxis under different sound pressure levels in the open arena.
Phonotaxis was quantified using proportion of time the female spent in the focal choice zone relative to the total amount of time spent in both the focal and standard choice zones. Box plot, asterisk, and letter descriptions provided in Fig. 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Female phonotaxis under different sound pressure levels in both the spherical treadmill (white bars) and open arena (grey bars).
Phonotaxis was compared across the two experimental methods by converting all phonotaxis data into z scores. Box plot, asterisk, and letter descriptions provided in Fig. 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander RD. Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution. 1962;16:443–467. doi: 10.2307/2406178. - DOI
    1. Alexander RD. Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimentel D, editor. Insects, science and society. New York: Academic Press; 1975.
    1. Arak A. Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: active choice or passive attraction? Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. 1988;22:317–327.
    1. Bailey NW. Love will tear you apart: different components of female choice exert contrasting selection pressures on male field crickets. Behavioral Ecology. 2008;19:960–966. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arn054. - DOI
    1. Bennet-Clark HC. Wing resonances in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2003;206:1479–1496. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00281. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources