Age-related changes in anatomic bases for the insertion of zygomatic implants
- PMID: 24951178
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.007
Age-related changes in anatomic bases for the insertion of zygomatic implants
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to verify whether Chinese patients are well-suited for zygomatic implantation and to observe age-related changes in the linear and angular anatomic bases of the maxilla and zygoma. Using three-dimensional images selected from maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans generated by SimPlant, linear and angular measurements were obtained by simulating zygomatic implantation. The edentulous group comprised 40 subjects aged between 62 and 65 years. A total of 120 dentate cases were divided into three groups based on age: the established occlusion group (n=40; 12-15 years old), the adult group (n=40; 37-40 years old), and the elderly group (n=40; 62-65 years old). The mean potential insertion length of the ordinary and additional zygomatic implants became longer with age in the dentate groups. For both zygomatic implant insertion areas, the anteroposterior lengths of the maxilla and zygoma were thicker in the older dentate groups (P<0.05). Significant differences were verified in the installation direction among the dentate groups. Gender was not a significant factor. The zygomatic skeleton changes with age, which results in linear and angular variations in the zygomatic implant insertion area. Therefore, the anatomic bases in Chinese adults are suitable for zygomatic implants.
Keywords: age-related changes; anatomy; bone thickness; cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); installing direction; zygomatic implants.
Copyright © 2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Virtual quad zygoma implant placement using cone beam computed tomography: sufficiency of malar bone volume, intraosseous implant length, and relationship to the sinus according to the degree of alveolar bone atrophy.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Feb;47(2):252-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 18. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 28823906
-
Treatment of the edentulous atrophic maxilla using zygomatic implants: evaluation of survival rates over 5-10 years.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Feb;43(2):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 10. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24120903
-
[The installation of zygomatic implants and drilling guide].Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;41(3):140-3. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 16777017 Chinese.
-
Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code.Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):41-58. doi: 10.1111/prd.12038. Periodontol 2000. 2014. PMID: 25123760 Review.
-
ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):366-378. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7488. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020. PMID: 32142574
Cited by
-
A novel technique to quantify bone-to-implant contact of zygomatic implants: a radiographic analysis based on three-dimensional image registration and segmentation.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Jan;52(2):20220210. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220210. Epub 2023 Jan 16. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36645052 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal bone-implant contact sites in the zygomatic region for quad zygomatic implants placement: a retrospective study in Vietnamese patients on CBCT.BDJ Open. 2025 Jun 20;11(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00350-8. BDJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40541944 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources