MRI of the epididymis: can the outcome of vasectomy reversal be predicted preoperatively?
- PMID: 24951200
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11619
MRI of the epididymis: can the outcome of vasectomy reversal be predicted preoperatively?
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe the MRI findings seen with tubular ectasia of the epididymis and investigate whether MRI may predict vasal/epididymal tubular occlusion before vasectomy reversal.
Materials and methods: First, we compared epididymal T1 signal intensity (measured as percentage change relative to ipsilateral testis) in 24 patients with sonographically established tubular ectasia compared with 22 control patients (sonographically normal epididymides). Second, in a subset of patients with tubular ectasia who subsequently underwent surgery to restore fertility (n = 10), we examined the relationship between epididymal T1 signal intensity and surgical outcome. Vasovasostomy (simple vas deferens reanastomosis with high success rate) was possible when viable sperm were detected in the vas deferens intraoperatively. When no sperm were detected, vasal/epididymal tubular occlusion was inferred and vasoepididymostomy (vas deferens to epididymal head anastomosis, a technically challenging procedure with poorer outcome) was performed.
Results: In tubular ectasia, we found increased epididymal T1 signal intensity (0-77%) compared with normal epididymides (-27 to 20%) (p < 0.0001). In patients with tubular ectasia who underwent surgery (n = 10), we found higher T1 epididymal signal intensity in cases of vasal/epididymal occlusion (0-70%) relative to cases in which vasal/epididymal patency was maintained (0-10%) (p = 0.01). By logistic regression, relative epididymal T1 signal intensity increase above 19.4% corresponded to greater than 90% probability of requiring vasoepididymostomy.
Conclusion: Increased epididymal T1 signal intensity (likely due to proteinaceous material lodged within the epididymal tubules) at preoperative MRI in patients undergoing vasectomy reversal suggests vasal/epididymal tubular occlusion and requirement for vasoepididymostomy rather than vasovasostomy.
Keywords: MRI; epididymis; tubular ectasia; ultrasound; vasectomy reversal.
Similar articles
-
Should all urologists performing vasectomy reversals be able to perform vasoepididymostomies if required?J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1048-50. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135118.43383.b1. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15311035
-
Epididymal extravasation following vasectomy as a cause for failure of vasectomy reversal.Fertil Steril. 1979 Mar;31(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43880-x. Fertil Steril. 1979. PMID: 437165
-
Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64504-x. J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9224325 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of vasectomy on the epididymis.Microsc Res Tech. 1995 Jan 1;30(1):82-100. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070300107. Microsc Res Tech. 1995. PMID: 7711322 Review.
-
The human epididymis: its function in sperm maturation.Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Sep;22(5):574-87. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw015. Epub 2016 Jun 15. Hum Reprod Update. 2016. PMID: 27307387 Review.
Cited by
-
Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.Reprod Med Biol. 2018 May 22;17(4):343-355. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12207. eCollection 2018 Oct. Reprod Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 30377390 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.Asian J Androl. 2016 May-Jun;18(3):365-71. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.175091. Asian J Androl. 2016. PMID: 26975488 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical