Measuring the population impact of introducing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in Canada
- PMID: 24951606
- PMCID: PMC4122471
- DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0469
Measuring the population impact of introducing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in Canada
Abstract
Background: The Cancer Risk Management Model (CRMM) was used to estimate the health and economic impact of introducing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada.
Methods: The CRMM uses Monte Carlo microsimulation representative of all Canadians. Lung cancer outputs were previously validated internally (Statistics Canada) and externally (Canadian Cancer Registry). We updated costs using the Ontario schedule of fees and benefits or the consumer price index to calculate 2013 Canadian dollars, discounted at a 3% rate. The reference model assumed that for stage I NSCLC, 75% of patients undergo surgery (lobectomy, sublobar resection, or pneumonectomy), 12.5% undergo radiotherapy (RT), and 12.5% undergo best supportive care (BSC). SABR was introduced in 2008 as an alternative to sublobar resection, RT, and BSC at rates reflective of the literature. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated; a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 (all amounts are in Canadian dollars) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was used from the health care payer perspective.
Results: The total cost for 25,085 new cases of lung cancer in 2013 was calculated to be $608,002,599. Mean upfront costs for the 4,318 stage I cases were $7,646.98 for RT, $8,815.55 for SABR, $12,161.17 for sublobar resection, $16,266.12 for lobectomy, $22,940.59 for pneumonectomy, and $14,582.87 for BSC. SABR dominated (higher QALY, lower cost) RT, sublobar resection, and BSC. RT had lower initial costs than SABR that were offset by subsequent costs associated with recurrence. Lobectomy was cost effective when compared with SABR, with an ICER of $55,909.06.
Conclusion: The use of SABR for NSCLC in Canada is projected to result in significant cost savings and survival gains.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Health policy; Microsimulation model; Non-small cell lung cancer; Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.
©AlphaMed Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
Figures

Similar articles
-
SABR vs. Limited Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Are We Closer to an Answer?Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0407-3. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27098533 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic radiation, sublobar resection, and lobectomy for early non-small cell lung cancers in older adults.J Geriatr Oncol. 2015 Jul;6(4):324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jun 17. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26094172 Free PMC article.
-
A cost-effectiveness analysis of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in the management of stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from the TROG 09.02 CHISEL study.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Oct;68(7):843-850. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13755. Epub 2024 Oct 9. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39382099 Clinical Trial.
-
Lobectomy, sublobar resection, and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancers in the elderly.JAMA Surg. 2014 Dec;149(12):1244-53. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.556. JAMA Surg. 2014. PMID: 25321323 Free PMC article.
-
Is stereotactic ablative radiotherapy equivalent to sublobar resection in high-risk surgical patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Nov;17(5):845-53. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt262. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23900381 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Is England closing the international gap in cancer survival?Br J Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;113(5):848-60. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.265. Epub 2015 Aug 4. Br J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26241817 Free PMC article.
-
SABR vs. Limited Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Are We Closer to an Answer?Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0407-3. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27098533 Review.
-
Empiric Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Collaborative Group multi-institutional evidence-based guidelines for the use of empiric stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer without pathologic confirmation.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Feb;8(1):5-14. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.12.12. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019. PMID: 30788230 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stereotactic radiotherapy for early lung cancer: Evidence-based approach and future directions.Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 12. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015. PMID: 26696779 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jul 28;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00452-w. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023. PMID: 37507748 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
-
- Rami-Porta R, Crowley JJ, Goldstraw P. The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;15:4–9. - PubMed
-
- Wisnivesky JP, Bonomi M, Henschke C, et al. Radiation therapy for the treatment of unresected stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2005;128:1461–1467. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources