A phase II trial of a surgical protocol to decrease the incidence of wound complications in obese gynecologic oncology patients
- PMID: 24952366
- PMCID: PMC4157586
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.012
A phase II trial of a surgical protocol to decrease the incidence of wound complications in obese gynecologic oncology patients
Abstract
Objectives: Obese women have a high incidence of wound separation after gynecologic surgery. We explored the effect of a prospective care pathway on the incidence of wound complications.
Methods: Women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m(2) undergoing a gynecologic procedure by a gynecologic oncologist via a vertical abdominal incision were eligible. The surgical protocol required: skin and subcutaneous tissues to be incised using a scalpel or cutting electrocautery, fascial closure using #1 polydioxanone suture, placement of a 7 mm Jackson-Pratt drain below Camper's fascia, closure of Camper's fascia with 3-0 plain catgut suture and skin closure with staples. Wound complication was defined as the presence of either a wound infection or any separation. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed using contingency tables. Univariable and multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of wound complications. Patients were compared using a multivariable model to a historical group of obese patients to assess the efficacy of the care pathway.
Results: 105 women were enrolled with a median BMI of 38.1. Overall, 39 (37%) had a wound complication. Women with a BMI of 30-39.9 kg/m(2) had a significantly lower risk of wound complication as compared to those with a BMI >40 kg/m(2) (23% vs 59%, p<0.001). After controlling for factors associated with wound complications the prospective care pathway was associated with a significantly decreased wound complication rate in women with BMI <40 kg/m(2) (OR 0.40, 95% C.I.: 0.18-0.89).
Conclusion: This surgical protocol leads to a decreased rate of wound complications among women with a BMI of 30-39.9 kg/m(2).
Keywords: Gynecologic surgery; Obesity; Surgical protocol; Wound complication.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Bratzler DW, Houck PM Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers W. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. American journal of surgery. 2005;189:395–404. - PubMed
-
- Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Jr, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, et al. Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;362:18–26. - PubMed
-
- Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infection control and hospital epidemiology: the official journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America. 1999;20:725–30. - PubMed
-
- Vegas AA, Jodra VM, Garcia ML. Nosocomial infection in surgery wards: a controlled study of increased duration of hospital stays and direct cost of hospitalization. European journal of epidemiology. 1993;9:504–10. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
