Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 21:12:178.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-178.

High-dimensional analysis of the aging immune system: verification of age-associated differences in immune signaling responses in healthy donors

Affiliations

High-dimensional analysis of the aging immune system: verification of age-associated differences in immune signaling responses in healthy donors

Diane M Longo et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: Single-cell network profiling (SCNP) is a multiparametric flow cytometry-based approach that simultaneously measures evoked signaling in multiple cell subsets. Previously, using the SCNP approach, age-associated immune signaling responses were identified in a cohort of 60 healthy donors.

Methods: In the current study, a high-dimensional analysis of intracellular signaling was performed by measuring 24 signaling nodes in 7 distinct immune cell subsets within PBMCs in an independent cohort of 174 healthy donors [144 elderly (>65 yrs); 30 young (25-40 yrs)].

Results: Associations between age and 9 immune signaling responses identified in the previously published 60 donor cohort were confirmed in the current study. Furthermore, within the current study cohort, 48 additional immune signaling responses differed significantly between young and elderly donors. These associations spanned all profiled modulators and immune cell subsets.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that SCNP, a systems-based approach, can capture the complexity of the cellular mechanisms underlying immunological aging. Further, the confirmation of age associations in an independent donor cohort supports the use of SCNP as a tool for identifying reproducible predictive biomarkers in areas such as vaccine response and response to cancer immunotherapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distributions of donor ages. Histograms of donors’ ages in the previously published (training) donor cohort (A) and in the current study (test) donor cohort (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of the immune signaling pathways and cell subsets profiled in the current study cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Verified age-associated immune signaling responses. Boxplots for Young and Elderly donors are shown for the 9 age-associated immune signaling responses that were independently verified in the current study cohort using the Gatekeeper strategy. The boxplots were constructed using the 1st quartile, the median, and the 3rd quartile. The whiskers represent the lowest and highest data points within 1.5 IQR (interquartile range). The circles represent data points for individual donors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Age-associated immune signaling responses in the current study cohort. Wilcoxon (two-sided) test statistics were calculated for each node in each cell subpopulation. Responses that differed significantly between Young and Elderly donors are indicated with purple (lower responses in Elderly than Young) and green (higher responses in Elderly than Young) with the color intensity corresponding to the magnitude of the p value. Asterisks indicate the 9 responses verified using the Gatekeeper approach. The number sign indicates the pre-specified response significantly associated with age that was not verified by the Gatekeeper approach. Solid gray boxes represent nodes that were responsive in the given cell subset but did not associate with age (p > 0.05). Solid white boxes represent nodes that did not show a response in the corresponding cell subset.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boraschi D, Aguado MT, Dutel C, Goronzy J, Louis J, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Rappuoli R, Del Giudice G. The gracefully aging immune system. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:185ps188. - PubMed
    1. Chen WH, Kozlovsky BF, Effros RB, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Edelman R, Sztein MB. Vaccination in the elderly: an immunological perspective. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:351–359. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.05.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haynes L, Lefebvre JS. Age-related Deficiencies in Antigen-Specific CD4 T cell Responses: Lessons from Mouse Models. Aging Dis. 2011;2:374–381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Understanding immunosenescence to improve responses to vaccines. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:428–436. doi: 10.1038/ni.2588. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goronzy JJ, Li G, Yang Z, Weyand CM. The janus head of T cell aging - autoimmunity and immunodeficiency. Front Immunol. 2013;4:131. - PMC - PubMed