Intrarater and interrater reliability of sagittal head posture: a novel technique performed by a physiotherapist and a speech and language pathologist
- PMID: 24954041
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.02.014
Intrarater and interrater reliability of sagittal head posture: a novel technique performed by a physiotherapist and a speech and language pathologist
Abstract
Introduction: Different professionals such as speech and language pathologists and voice scientists are involved in the evaluation of head and neck posture. Therefore, a reliable, time-efficient, and precise method of posture assessment is essential for use in clinical and research settings. Photogrammetry is one of the most commonly used methods to assess head and neck posture. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the intrarater reliability of the method with a large sample size and the interrater reliability by two different specialists (a physiotherapist and a speech and language pathologist).
Method: A total of three hundred four subjects (144 males and 160 females) aged between 18 and 28 years participated in the study. During the test session, a photograph was taken of the left-side profile of each subject in their ordinary and comfortable position. The head posture angle of each picture was calculated by two raters. The whole procedure was repeated in a retest session, 24 hours later. A total number of eight analyses were performed for each subject. The reliability was evaluated at several stages hierarchically and after confirming the reliability in each step, the next step was investigated. Paired t tests on the differences of scores obtained at all the aforementioned stages were used to ensure the absence of any systematic bias. To assess the reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurements (SEMs) were calculated.
Results: There was no significant difference between the mean values of the test and the retest angles at any stage of calculating the head posture angle in both pictures by both examiners (P > 0.05). The ICC and SEM values calculated for all stages were between 0.86-0.97 and 0.52-1.53, respectively.
Conclusion: Systematic bias has not occurred at any stage. The ICC and SEM values calculated have demonstrated that there were appropriate relative and absolute reliabilities in all stages. This method is suggested to be used simply in research and clinical areas by different specialists.
Keywords: Photogrammetry; Posture; Reliability.
Copyright © 2014 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Reliability of the craniocervical posture assessment: visual and angular measurements using photographs and radiographs.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;36(9):619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013. PMID: 24144423
-
Intrarater and interrater reliability of photographic measurement of upper-body standing posture of adolescents.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Jan;38(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Nov 12. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015. PMID: 25467608
-
Assessment of forward head posture in females: observational and photogrammetry methods.J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):131-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130426. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 23963268 Clinical Trial.
-
Investigation of the validity and reliability of four objective techniques for measuring forward shoulder posture.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Jan;25(1):34-42. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1997.25.1.34. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997. PMID: 8979174 Review.
-
Photogrammetric Assessment of Upper Body Posture Using Postural Angles: A Literature Review.J Chiropr Med. 2017 Jun;16(2):131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Mar 18. J Chiropr Med. 2017. PMID: 28559753 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Reliability and Validity of Non-radiographic Methods of Forward Head Posture Measurement: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2022 Aug 5;14(8):e27696. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27696. eCollection 2022 Aug. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35935117 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical