Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 1;106(2):419-434.
doi: 10.1037/a0035692.

Developmental Relations between Reading and Writing at the Word, Sentence and Text Levels: A Latent Change Score Analysis

Affiliations

Developmental Relations between Reading and Writing at the Word, Sentence and Text Levels: A Latent Change Score Analysis

Yusra Ahmed et al. J Educ Psychol. .

Abstract

Relations between reading and writing have been studied extensively but the less is known about the developmental nature of their interrelations. This study applied latent change score modeling to investigate longitudinal relations between reading and writing skills at the word, sentence and text levels. Latent change score models were used to compare unidirectional pathways (reading-to-writing and writing-to-reading) and bidirectional pathways in a test of nested models. Participants included 316 boys and girls who were assessed annually in grades 1 through 4. Measures of reading included pseudo-word decoding, sentence reading efficiency, oral reading fluency and passage comprehension. Measures of writing included spelling, a sentence combining task and writing prompts. Findings suggest that a reading-to-writing model better described the data for the word and text levels of language, but a bidirectional model best fit the data at the sentence level.

Keywords: language; latent change score; literacy; reading; spelling; writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unstandardized Estimates for the Word Level Reading-to-Writing Model. Note. a) auto-proportions b) auto-regressions c) status to change d) change to change. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unstandardized Estimates for the Sentence Level Bidirectional Model. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Unstandardized Estimates for the Fluency Level Reading-to-Writing Model. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Unstandardized Estimates for the Discourse Level Reading-to-Writing Model. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott RD, Berninger VW. Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1993;85(3):85, 478–508.
    1. Abbott RD, Berninger VW, Fayol M. Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2010;102(3):281–298. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aarnoutse C, van Leeuwe J, Verhoeven L. Early literacy from a longitudinal perspective. Educational Research and Evolution. 2005;11(3):253–275.
    1. Babayigit S, Stainthrop R. Modeling the relationships between cognitive-linguistic skills and literacy skills: New insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011;103(1):169–189.
    1. Bates E, Goodman J. The emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In: MacWhinney B, editor. The emergence of language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Mahwah, NJ: 1999. pp. 27–80.

LinkOut - more resources