Student perceptions of specific components within a personalized feedback intervention

Abstract

Previous research suggests that personalized feedback interventions (PFI) can be an effective tool in reducing risky alcohol use among college students; however, little is known about how students perceive the individual components that are typically used during PFIs. In the current study, participants (N = 219, 63.5% female, 84% Caucasian, undergraduates enrolled in introductory psychology courses) reported their drinking behavior in the past month, and then immediately received a computerized PFI based on their self-reported alcohol use. The PFI was modeled from the Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) approach and included 10 separate feedback components presented in random order. Participants provided acceptability ratings on each of the 10 components. Overall, participants found the PFI generally acceptable, with females rating the PFI as more acceptable than males, and binge drinkers (defined as 5 or more drinks on an occasion for males and 4 or more drinks for females) rating the PFI more acceptable than nonbinge drinkers. Differences in acceptability emerged across the 10 components, as participants rated the practical cost components (e.g., money spent on alcohol, calories consumed) as more acceptable than didactic information (e.g., impact of blood alcohol levels) and personal negative consequences. The results are similar to a previous study that examines student reactions to PFIs (Miller & Leffingwell, 2013). Overall, the findings suggest that college students prefer certain feedback components to others. Moreover, the findings indicate that future research is needed to examine the relationship between preferred components and treatment outcomes to determine which components are most effective for reducing risky drinking.