Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 May;40(5):470-5.
doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.930157. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

Corneal biomechanical comparison of pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and healthy subjects

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Corneal biomechanical comparison of pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and healthy subjects

Serpil Yazgan et al. Curr Eye Res. 2015 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanical properties between healthy subjects and patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG) using the ocular response analyzer (ORA).

Materials and methods: One hundred eighteen eyes of 45 healthy, 43 PEX and 30 PEXG eyes were included in to the study. Corneal biomechanical parameters measurements were obtained using ORA. The main parameters assessed were corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated pressure measurement (IOPg) and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Ultrasound pachymetry was used for measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT).

Results: In healthy subjects, PEX and PEXG eyes' mean CH values were 10.3 ± 1.4, 8.2 ± 1.4 and 6.8 ± 1.7 mmHg, respectively. The difference in mean CH between the PEXG and other two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Mean CRF values were 10.3 ± 0.7, 7.9 ± 1.6 and 7.9 ± 1.9 mmHg, in healthy subjects PEX and PEXG, respectively. The difference in mean CRF between the PEX and PEXG was not statistically significant (p = 0.630), however the mean CRF was significantly higher in healthy subjects, compared to other two groups. Mean CCT were 546.3 ± 28, 525.5 ± 35 and 509 ± 36 μ, in healthy subjects, PEX and PEXG, respectively. The differences on CCT were also significant among the three groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this study, the corneal biomechanical features of subjects with PEX were found to be changed as compared to healthy controls. In these patients; CH, CRF and CCT were decreased which was more obvious in patients with PEXG in comparison to PEX patients.

Keywords: Corneal biomechanics; glaucoma; ocular response analyzer; pseudoexfoliation syndrome; pseudoexfoliative glaucoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources