Similar articles

• Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?

  Tunis AS, McInnes MD, Hanna R, Esmail K. Tunis AS, et al. Radiology. 2013 Nov;269(2):413-26. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130273. Epub 2013 Jul 3. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23824992
• Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

  Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Moher D, et al. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Feb 18. Int J Surg. 2010. PMID: 20171303 No abstract available.
• Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

  Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Moher D, et al. Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;89(9):873-80. Phys Ther. 2009. PMID: 19723669 No abstract available.
• Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA.

  Leclercq V, Beaudart C, Ajamieh S, Rabenda V, Tirelli E, Bruyère O. Leclercq V, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 26. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 31254618 Review.
• Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature.

  O'Leary JD, Crawford MW. O'Leary JD, et al. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;60(8):813-21. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9973-z. Epub 2013 Jun 13. Can J Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23760791 Review.