Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 24;9(6):e100948.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100948. eCollection 2014.

HomeRun Vector Assembly System: a flexible and standardized cloning system for assembly of multi-modular DNA constructs

Affiliations

HomeRun Vector Assembly System: a flexible and standardized cloning system for assembly of multi-modular DNA constructs

Ming V Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Advances in molecular and synthetic biology call for efficient assembly of multi-modular DNA constructs. We hereby present a novel modular cloning method that obviates the need for restriction endonucleases and significantly improves the efficiency in the design and construction of complex DNA molecules by standardizing all DNA elements and cloning reactions. Our system, named HomeRun Vector Assembly System (HVAS), employs a three-tiered vector series that utilizes both multisite gateway cloning and homing endonucleases, with the former building individual functional modules and the latter linking modules into the final construct. As a proof-of-principle, we first built a two-module construct that supported doxycycline-induced expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP). Further, with a three-module construct we showed quantitatively that there was minimal promoter leakage between neighbouring modules. Finally, we developed a method, in vitro Cre recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) cloning, to regenerate a gateway destination vector from a previous multisite gateway cloning reaction, allowing access to existing DNA element libraries in conventional gateway entry clones, and simple creation of constructs ready for in vivo RMCE. We believe these methods constitute a useful addition to the standard molecular cloning techniques that could potentially support industrial scale synthesis of DNA constructs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: DAL is a consultant, co-founder, and equity holder of NeoClone Biotechnology, Inc., a company providing antibodies to its customers. DAL is a consultant, co-founder, and equity holder of Discovery Genomics, Inc., a company pursuing human gene therapy. DAL has collaborative research agreements with Novartis and Genentech. Genentech is funding a research project in his laboratory. The contents of this manuscript are unrelated to all of the companies mentioned above. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the HVAS vector system and its assembly process.
1A, Assembly of a functional module in pBASE vectors from elements in pENTR vectors; 1B, Assembly of multi-modular construct in pHR assembly vectors from modules in pBASE shuttle vectors. Up to 4 elements in pENTR vectors can be assembled on each pBASE shuttle vector, and up to 4 modules in the pBASE shuttle vectors can sequentially dock onto the pHR assembly vector. Abbreviations: L1, attL1; R5, attR5; L5, attL5, L4, attL4; R4, attR4; R3, attR3; L3, attL3; L2, attL2; R2, attR2; R1, attR1; HE, homing endonuclease; DEST, destination cassette; HE1, I-SceI; HE2, I-CeuI; HE3, PI-SceI; HE4, PI-PspI; ITR, inverted terminal repeat.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Building of a functional two-module construct with HVAS which supported doxycycline-induced GFP expression.
2A, schematic illustration of the construct. The abbreviations of depicted elements were annotated in Table 1. 2B, above construct was stably transfected into HCT116 cells, and selected with 1 µg/ml puromycin. Surviving cells were treated with or without 1 µg/ml doxycycline over night before image acquisition with bright field and fluorescent microscopy.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Minimal cross-modular promoter leakiness was observed with dual luciferase assay.
3A, Schematic illustration of the three-module construct. The abbreviations of depicted elements were annotated in Table 1. 3B, and 3C, response of firefly (3B) and renilla (3C) luciferase activities to increasing concentrations of doxycycline; the above construct was stably transfected into HCT116 cells and selected with 1 µg/ml puromycin. Surviving cells were seeded in 24-well plates the day prior to treatment to reach around 80% confluence at the time of treatment; vehicle or doxycycline of indicated concentrations were added for incubation for 24 hours at 37°C before dual luciferase assay. Each treatment was triplicated. Results were represented as relative light units normalized to protein content (RLU/µg). Comparisons were made between results in samples treated with indicated doxycycline concentration and those treated with vehicle only (doxycycline 0 µg/ml). *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4. In vitro Cre RMCE cloning and its application in HVAS.
4A, schematic illustration of regeneration of a destination vector with in vitro Cre RMCE cloning. The abbreviations of depicted elements were annotated in Table 1. 4B, fluorescence microscopy for HCT116 cells stably transfected with a 2-module construct built with HVAS and in vitro Cre RMCE cloning as illustrated. Open triangle, canonical loxP; solid triangle, loxN variant. 4C, in vivo RMCE, the cells shown in 4B were transfected with floxed puroR cDNA along with pRN-Cre, selected with both puromycin (1 µg/ml) and G418 (1 mg/ml). Fluorescence and bright field imaging of representative colonies were shown.

References

    1. Slusarczyk AL, Lin A, Weiss R (2012) Foundations for the design and implementation of synthetic genetic circuits. Nat Rev Genet 13: 406–420 10.1038/nrg3227 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knight T (2003) Idempotent vector design for standard assembly of biobricks. MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group Technical Reports, http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/21168.
    1. Engler C, Kandzia R, Marillonnet S (2008) A one pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One 3: e3647 10.1371/journal.pone.0003647 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarrion-Perdigones A, Falconi EE, Zandalinas SI, Juarez P, Fernandez-del-Carmen A, et al. (2011) GoldenBraid: An iterative cloning system for standardized assembly of reusable genetic modules. PLoS One 6: e21622 10.1371/journal.pone.0021622 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA III, et al. (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6: 343–345 10.1038/nmeth.1318 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types