Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 2;3(3):1198-214.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci3031198.

Neural correlates of processing passive sentences

Affiliations

Neural correlates of processing passive sentences

Jennifer E Mack et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Previous research has shown that comprehension of complex sentences involving wh-movement (e.g., object-relative clauses) elicits activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and left posterior temporal cortex. However, relatively little is known about the neural correlates of processing passive sentences, which differ from other complex sentences in terms of representation (i.e., noun phrase (NP)-movement) and processing (i.e., the time course of syntactic reanalysis). In the present study, 27 adults (14 younger and 13 older) listened to passive and active sentences and performed a sentence-picture verification task using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Passive sentences, relative to active sentences, elicited greater activation in bilateral IFG and left temporo-occipital regions. Participant age did not significantly affect patterns of activation. Consistent with previous research, activation in left temporo-occipital cortex likely reflects thematic reanalysis processes, whereas, activation in the left IFG supports processing of complex syntax (i.e., NP-movement). Right IFG activation may reflect syntactic reanalysis processing demands associated with the sentence-picture verification task.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regions of differential activation for passive as compared to active sentences (voxel-wise threshold of p < 0.001; k ≥ 85).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 1981.
    1. Dickey M.W., Choy J.J., Thompson C.K. Real-time comprehension of wh-movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain Lang. 2007;100:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickey M.W., Thompson C.K. Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. J. Neurolinguist. 2009;22:563–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.06.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Love T., Swinney D., Walenski M., Zurif E. How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang. 2008;107:203–219. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicol J., Fodor J.D., Swinney D. Using Cross-Modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 1994;20:1229–1238. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1229. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources