Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 24:10:53.
doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-53.

Innovation in regulation of rapidly changing health markets

Affiliations

Innovation in regulation of rapidly changing health markets

Gerald Bloom et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

The rapid evolution and spread of health markets across low and middle-income countries (LMICs) has contributed to a significant increase in the availability of health-related goods and services around the world. The support institutions needed to regulate these markets have lagged behind, with regulatory systems that are weak and under-resourced. This paper explores the key issues associated with regulation of health markets in LMICs, and the different goals of regulation, namely quality and safety of care, value for money, social agreement over fair access and financing, and accountability. Licensing, price controls, and other traditional approaches to the regulation of markets for health products and services have played an important role, but they have been of questionable effectiveness in ensuring safety and efficacy at the point of the user in LMICs. The paper proposes a health market systems conceptual framework, using the value chain for the production, distribution and retail of health goods and services, to examine regulation of health markets in the LMIC context. We conclude by exploring the changing context going forwards, laying out implications for future heath market regulation. We argue that the case for new approaches to the regulation of markets for health products and services in LMICs is compelling. Although traditional "command and control" approaches will have a place in the toolkit of regulators, a broader bundle of approaches is needed that is adapted to the national and market-level context of particular LMICs. The implication is that it is not possible to apply standard or single interventions across countries, as approaches proven to work well in one context will not necessarily work well elsewhere.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health market systems and regulatory approaches.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bloom G, Kanjilal B, Lucas H, Peters DH. Transforming health markets in Asia and Africa: Improving quality and access for the poor. 2012. London: Routledge; 2012.
    1. Newton PN, Green MD, Fernandez FM. Impact of poor quality medicines in the developing world. Trends Pharmacol. 2010;31:99–101. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.11.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peters DH, Bloom G. Developing world: bring order to unregulated health markets. Nature. 2012;487:163–165. doi: 10.1038/487163a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. OECD. The OECD report on regulatory reform. Paris: OECD; 1997.
    1. Black J. Critical reflections on regulation, CARR discussion paper No. 4. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2002. (Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation).

MeSH terms