Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 24:12:22.
doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-12-22.

How I do it: judging appropriateness for TTE and TEE

Affiliations

How I do it: judging appropriateness for TTE and TEE

Ricardo Fonseca et al. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. .

Abstract

The increasing cost of healthcare is a widespread international problem to which the cost of imaging has been an important contributor. Some imaging tests are ordered inappropriately and contribute to wasted use of resources. Appropriate use criteria have been developed in the USA in order to guide test selection, but there are a number of problems, including the evidence base for these criteria and the steps that can be taken to change physician practice. A restrictive approach to test ordering is difficult to fit to the nuances of clinical presentation and may compromise patient care. We propose an alternative approach to physician guidance based on the most common markers of inappropriate testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in the use of echocardiography in the US in 1996. Regional variations by hospital referral region, expressed as a ratio to the US average. From Wennberg D, et al. The Dartmouth Atlas of Cardiovascular Health Care. P65. 1999 [11].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Major causes of inappropriate echocardiography. Proportions of inappropriate tests (x axis) ordered by cardiologists (red) and non-cardiologists (blue). Modified from Ward RP et al. [39].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proposed checklist to discriminate possible inappropriate orders. A simplified check-list to be reviewed at point of service, as a prompt to seeking clarification from the referring physician.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, La Calle JR, Lazaro P, Loo M, McDonnell J, Vader JP, Kaham JP. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method user's manual. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 2001.
    1. Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE. A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical Technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(01):53–63. doi: 10.1017/S0266462300002774. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel MR, Spertus JA, Brindis RG, Hendel RC, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, Raskin IE. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1606–1613. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Allen JM, Min JK, Shaw LJ, Wolk MJ, Douglas PS, Kramer CM, Stainback RF, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, Brindis RG. Appropriate Use of Cardiovascular Technology 2013 ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria Methodology Update: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(12):1305–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr JJ, Hendel RC, White RD, Patel MR, Wolk MJ, Bettmann MA, Douglas P, Rybicki FJ, Kramer CM, Woodard PK, Shaw LJ, Yucel EK, Writing G. Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging A Methodology for the Development of Joint Criteria for the Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American College of Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10(6):456–463. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.03.019. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms