Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 24;4(6):e004817.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004817.

Digitised audio questionnaire for assessment of informed consent comprehension in a low-literacy African research population: development and psychometric evaluation

Muhammed O Afolabi  1 , Kalifa Bojang  2 , Umberto D'Alessandro  1 , Martin O C Ota  3 , Egeruan B Imoukhuede  4 , Raffaella Ravinetto  5 , Heidi J Larson  6 , Nuala McGrath  7 , Daniel Chandramohan  8
Affiliations

Digitised audio questionnaire for assessment of informed consent comprehension in a low-literacy African research population: development and psychometric evaluation

Muhammed O Afolabi et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To develop and psychometrically evaluate an audio digitised tool for assessment of comprehension of informed consent among low-literacy Gambian research participants.

Setting: We conducted this study in the Gambia where a high illiteracy rate and absence of standardised writing formats of local languages pose major challenges for research participants to comprehend consent information. We developed a 34-item questionnaire to assess participants' comprehension of key elements of informed consent. The questionnaire was face validated and content validated by experienced researchers. To bypass the challenge of a lack of standardised writing formats, we audiorecorded the questionnaire in three major Gambian languages: Mandinka, Wolof and Fula. The questionnaire was further developed into an audio computer-assisted interview format.

Participants: The digitised questionnaire was administered to 250 participants enrolled in two clinical trials in the urban and rural areas of the Gambia. One week after first administration, the questionnaire was readministered to half of the participants who were randomly selected. Participants were eligible if enrolled in the parent trials and could speak any of the three major Gambian languages.

Outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was reliability and validity of the questionnaire.

Results: Item reduction by factor analysis showed that 21 of the question items have strong factor loadings. These were retained along with five other items which were fundamental components of informed consent. The 26-item questionnaire has high internal consistency with a Cronbach's α of 0.73-0.79 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95% CI 0.923 to 0.954). Hypotheses testing also showed that the questionnaire has a positive correlation with a similar questionnaire and discriminates between participants with and without education.

Conclusions: We have developed a reliable and valid measure of comprehension of informed consent information for the Gambian context, which might be easily adapted to similar settings. This is a major step towards engendering comprehension of informed consent information among low-literacy participants.

Keywords: Ethics (see Medical Ethics); Medical Ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cattell's scree plot for the item-level factor analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Angell M. The ethics of clinical research in the Third World. N Engl J Med 1997;337:847–9 - PubMed
    1. Annas GJ. Globalized clinical trials and informed consent. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2050–3 - PubMed
    1. WMA. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki––ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects: adopted by the 18th World. Helsinki, Finland: Medical Association General Assembly, June 1964, and last amended by the 64th World Medical Association General Assembly in Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1760318 (accessed 18 Nov 2013)
    1. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 1979. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html (accessed 18 Nov 2013) - PubMed
    1. CIOMS. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects, prepared by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. 3rd edn Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. http://www.cioms.ch/publications/guidelines/guidelines_nov_2002_blurb.htm (accessed 2 Jun 2013) - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources