Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Summer;2014(144):53-69.
doi: 10.1002/cad.20060.

The complexities of adolescent dating and sexual relationships: fluidity, meaning(s), and implications for young adults' well-being

Wendy D Manning  1 , Monica A Longmore, Jennifer Copp, Peggy C Giordano
Affiliations

The complexities of adolescent dating and sexual relationships: fluidity, meaning(s), and implications for young adults' well-being

Wendy D Manning et al. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2014 Summer.

Abstract

The complexity of adolescents' dating and sexual lives is not easily operationalized with simple indicators of dating or sexual activity. While building on prior work that emphasizes the "risky" nature of adolescents' intimate relationships, we assess whether a variety of indicators reflecting the complexity of adolescents' relationships influence early adult well-being (i.e., depressive symptoms, self-esteem, gainful activity, intimate partner violence, and relationship quality). Our analysis of longitudinal data from the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study showed that the number of adolescent dating and sexual partners does not uniformly influence indicators of young adult well-being, which is at odds with a risk framework. The number of dating partners with whom the individual was sexually active, and not the number of "casual" sex partners, increased the odds of intimate partner violence during young adulthood. Relationship churning and sexual nonexclusivity during adolescence were associated with lower relationship quality during young adulthood. Sexual nonexclusivity during adolescence influenced self-reports of depressive symptoms and lower self-esteem among young adults. Future research should develop more nuanced conceptualizations of adolescent dating and sexual relationships and integrate adolescent dating and sexual experiences into research on early adult well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abma J, Martinez G, Copen C. Teenagers in the United States: Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, National Survey of Family Growth 2006–2008. Vital Health Statistics. 2010;23(30):1–47. - PubMed
    1. Adimora A, Schoenbach V, Taylor E, Khan M, Schwartz R. Concurrent partnerships, nonmonogamous partners, and substance use among women in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;101:128–136. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Binstock G, Thornton A. Separations, reconciliations, and living apart in cohabiting and marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2003;65(2):432–443.
    1. Brown B. “You’re going out with who?”: Peer group influences on adolescent romantic relationships. In: Furman W, Brown B, Feiring C, editors. The development of romantic relationships in adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1999. pp. 291–329.
    1. Carver K, Joyner K, Udry J. National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In: Florsheim P, editor. Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. pp. 23–56.

LinkOut - more resources