Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;24(9):2059-68.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3260-4. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic (DCE-US) assessment of the early response after combined gemcitabine and HIFU with low-power treatment for the mouse xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer

Affiliations

Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic (DCE-US) assessment of the early response after combined gemcitabine and HIFU with low-power treatment for the mouse xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer

Jung Hoon Kim et al. Eur Radiol. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine and HIFU for a mouse model of pancreatic cancer, and the role of DCE-US for predicting early treatment response compared with pathology.

Materials and methods: In 48 PANC-1- nude mice (G1, HIFU_higher power [n = 14]; G2, gemcitabine [n = 12]; G3, combined gemcitabine and HIFU_low power [n = 12]; and G4, control [n = 10]), pulsed HIFU or gemcitabine therapy was used. DCE-US was performed 1 day before and after first treatment. Seven DCE-US perfusion parameters were obtained. Therapeutic efficacy was estimated using necrotic fraction and apoptosis. Correlation between tumour size and US perfusion parameters was analysed.

Results: Pathology results showed that combined gemcitabine and HIFU using low-power treatment had a more effective response than other treatments, including in the control group, i.e. necrotic fraction: 40.5 ± 4.9 vs. 16.9 ± 8.0, p = 0.000 and apoptosis: 44.3 ± 29.4 vs. 7.9 ± 4.9, p = 0.002. In this group, US perfusion parameters, including peak intensity (22.6 ± 22.6 vs. 9.6 ± 6.3, p = 0.002), AUC (961.8 ± 96.9 vs. 884.4 ± 91.4, p = 0.000), and AUCout (799.9 ± 75.6 vs. 747.1 ± 77.9, p = 0.000), had significantly decreased 1 day following first treatment (p < 0.05). In addition, peak intensity, AUC, and AUCout showed a tendency to decrease in treated groups. Alternatively, peak intensity, AUC, and AUCout showed a tendency to increase in control group.

Conclusion: Gemcitabine and HIFU were more effective and safer than other treatments. US perfusion parameters were useful for predicting early therapeutic response 1 day following treatment.

Key points: Recently, treatment of pancreatic cancer has changed based on a multidisciplinary approach. Combined gemcitabine_HIFU demonstrated more effective therapeutic response than other treatments. DCE-US is useful for predicting early therapeutic response 1 day after treatment. In the combined group, PI, AUC, and AUC (out) decreased 1 day after treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Jun;38(6):1019-29 - PubMed
    1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Oct;35(10):1722-36 - PubMed
    1. Int J Hyperthermia. 2007 Mar;23(2):105-20 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):1034-40 - PubMed
    1. Anticancer Drugs. 2010 Apr;21(4):447-52 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources