Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;5(2):155-9.
doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.132304.

Prospective study of treatment outcome of implant retained mandibular overdenture: Two years follow-up

Vimal Arora  1 , Dinesh Kumar  2 , V S Legha  2 , K V Arun Kumar  2
Affiliations

Prospective study of treatment outcome of implant retained mandibular overdenture: Two years follow-up

Vimal Arora et al. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcome of immediately loaded Implants in the interforaminal region of anterior mandible.

Materials and methods: A total of 15 completely edentulous patients aged between 50 and 70 years were selected satisfying certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two implants were placed in 33 and 43 region (B and D location) and the implants were loaded immediately by mandibular overdenture retained with O-ring attachments. The implants were evaluated for various clinical parameters at 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years intervals after initial placement.

Results: There was increased marginal bone loss around implants during the 1(st) year after that the bone loss was insignificant. Clinical stability of immediately loaded implants was lower initially for 6 months, but improved by the end of 1(st) year. Survival rate for immediately loaded implants was 96.6% at the end of the period of study.

Conclusion: Immediate loading of interforaminal mandibular implants demonstrated a highly acceptable clinical success at the end of 2 years. However, initially the marginal bone level and clinical stability were significantly lower which showed improvement with time.

Keywords: Immediate loading; O-ring attachment; mandibular overdenture; marginal bone; periotest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Orthopantomogram showing steel balls in B and D location
Figure 2
Figure 2
Surgical placement of implants
Figure 3
Figure 3
Postoperative orthopantomogram showing two implants in B and D location
Figure 4
Figure 4
O-ring attachment in intaglio surface of denture
Figure 5
Figure 5
Complete dentures inserted and occlusion adjusted
Chat 1
Chat 1
Mean mobility by period
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Babbush CA, Kent JN, Misiek DJ. Titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) screw implants for the reconstruction of the edentulous mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:274–82. - PubMed
    1. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:291–8. - PubMed
    1. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:170–7. - PubMed
    1. Jemt T, Stålblad PA. The effect of chewing movements on changing mandibular complete dentures to osseointegrated overdentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:357–61. - PubMed
    1. Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Brånemark System MKII implants: A prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:537–46. - PubMed