Comparison of two incision designs for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized comparative clinical study
- PMID: 24963241
- PMCID: PMC4067778
- DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.132308
Comparison of two incision designs for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized comparative clinical study
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of flap design on visibility and accessibility during removal of impacted third molar and hematoma formation, wound gaping and healing of flap post-operatively.
Study design: The randomized prospective comparative study included 30 patients with impacted mandibular third molars. Two flap designs namely envelope flap (Koener's incision) and 'triangular flap' (Ward's incision) were used. After 7 days, sutures were removed and status of wound, periodontal health, and progress of healing was assessed. Patients were followed through 15 days to judge the incidence of post-operative complications in both groups.
Results: No statistical differences were noted between the groups in terms of visibility, accessibility, excessive bleeding during surgery, healing of flap, sensitivity of adjacent teeth, and dry socket. A statistically significant difference was observed in post-operative hematoma, wound gaping, and distal pocket in adjacent tooth, which was significant in Ward's triangular incision group in comparison to Koeiner's envelope incision group.
Conclusion: The selection of the flap design is dependent on needs of the case and preference of the operating surgeon and does not seem to have a significant influence on the health of tissues. In order to avoid wide area of exposure of bone, the operating surgeon should clinically and radiographically assess the designing of incision and mucoperiosteal flap, the clinical relevance is still debatable.
Keywords: Envelope flap; Koener's incision; Ward's incision; impacted mandibular third molar; triangular flap.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Jakse N, Bankaoglu V, Wimmer G, Eskici A, Pertl C. Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: Evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:7–12. - PubMed
-
- Ash MM, Costich ER, Hayward JR. A study of periodontal hazards of third molars. J Periodontol. 1962;33:209.
-
- Schofield ID, Kogon SL, Donner A. Long-term comparison of two surgical flap designs for third molar surgery on the health of the periodontal tissue of the second molar tooth. J Can Dent Assoc. 1988;54:689–91. - PubMed
-
- Kirk DG, Liston PN, Tong DC, Love RM. Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:e1–6. - PubMed
-
- Baqain ZH, Al-Shafii A, Hamdan AA, Sawair FA. Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: A split mouth randomized clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1020–4. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
