Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014:2014:852681.
doi: 10.1155/2014/852681. Epub 2014 May 15.

Diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

Giorgio Treglia et al. Biomed Res Int. 2014.

Abstract

Objective: To meta-analyze published data about the diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of studies published through January 2014 on this topic was performed. All retrieved studies were reviewed and qualitatively analyzed. Pooled sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), accuracy, and area under the summary ROC curve (AUC) of (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT on a per examination-based analysis were calculated. Subgroup analyses considering the size of residual/recurrent lesions were carried out.

Results: Nine studies including 375 scans were selected. The pooled analysis provided the following results: sensitivity 78% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 67-87%), specificity 86% (95% CI: 81-89%), PPV 58% (95% CI: 48-68%), NPV 94% (95% CI: 90-96%), and accuracy 84% (95% CI: 80-88%). The AUC was 0.90. A better diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT in evaluating residual/recurrent lesions >3 cm compared to those <3 cm was found.

Conclusions: (18)F-FDG-PET and PET/CT were demonstrated to be accurate imaging methods in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma; nevertheless possible sources of false-negative and false-positive results should be considered. The literature focusing on this setting still remains limited and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the search for eligible studies on the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET or PET/CT in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plots of pooled sensitivity and specificity and summary ROC curve of 18F-FDG-PET or PET/CT in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma. The area under the summary ROC curve (0.90) demonstrates that 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT are accurate methods in this setting.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) of 18F-FDG-PET or PET/CT in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Funnel plots regarding the publication bias on the sensitivity (a) and specificity (b) of 18F-FDG-PET or PET/CT in the postchemotherapy management of patients with seminoma.

References

    1. Nallu A, Mannuel HD, Hussain A. Testicular germ cell tumors: biology and clinical update. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2013;25:266–272. - PubMed
    1. Daneshmand S, Albers P, Fosså SD, et al. Contemporary management of postchemotherapy testis cancer. European Urology. 2012;62(5):867–876. - PubMed
    1. Quek ML, Simma-Chiang V, Stein JP, Pinski J, Quinn DI, Skinner DG. Postchemotherapy residual masses in advanced seminoma: current management and outcomes. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2005;5(5):869–874. - PubMed
    1. Treglia G, Cason E, Fagioli G. Recent applications of nuclear medicine in diagnostics (I part) Italian Journal of Medicine. 2010;4(2):84–91.
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(10):e1–e34. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources