Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;24(10):2449-57.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3266-y. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Dual-energy computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: the role of hard plaque imaging for endoleak detection

Affiliations

Dual-energy computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: the role of hard plaque imaging for endoleak detection

R Müller-Wille et al. Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for detection of endoleaks and aneurysm sac calcifications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using hard plaque imaging algorithms.

Materials and methods: One hundred five patients received 108 triple-phase contrast-enhanced CT (non-contrast, arterial and delayed phase) after EVAR. The delayed phase was acquired in dual-energy and post-processed using the standard (HPI-S) and a modified (HPI-M) hard plaque imaging algorithm. The reference standard was determined using the triple-phase CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. All images were analysed separately for the presence of endoleaks and calcifications by two independent readers; sensitivity, specificity and interobserver agreement were calculated.

Results: Endoleaks and calcifications were present in 25.9 % (28/108) and 20.4 % (22/108) of images. The HPI-S images had a sensitivity/specificity of 54 %/100 % (reader 1) and 57 %/99 % (reader 2), the HPI-M images of 93 %/92 % (reader 1) and 96 %/92 % (reader 2) for detection of endoleaks. For detection of calcifications HPI-S had a sensitivity/specificity of 91 %/99 % (reader 1) and 95 %/97 % (reader 2), the HPI-M images of 91 %/99 % (reader 1) and 91 %/99 % (reader 2), respectively.

Conclusion: Using HPI-M, DECT enables an accurate diagnosis of endoleaks after EVAR and allows distinguishing between endoleaks and calcifications with high diagnostic accuracy.

Key points: • Dual-energy computed tomography allows the diagnosis of aortic pathologies after EVAR. • Hard plaque imaging algorithms can distinguish between endoleaks and aneurysm sac calcifications. • The modified hard plaque imaging algorithm detects endoleaks with high diagnostic accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):641-55 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 2013 Aug;48(8):622-7 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 1977 Nov-Dec;12(6):545-51 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):516-24 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2006 Dec;16(12):2849-57 - PubMed

MeSH terms