A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care-study protocol
- PMID: 24965918
- PMCID: PMC4078785
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005788
A health economic model for the development and evaluation of innovations in aged care: an application to consumer-directed care-study protocol
Abstract
Introduction: Consumer-directed care is currently being embraced within Australia and internationally as a means of promoting autonomy and choice in the delivery of health and aged care services. Despite its wide proliferation little research has been conducted to date to assess the views and preferences of older people for consumer-directed care or to assess the costs and benefits of such an approach relative to existing models of service delivery.
Methods and analysis: A comprehensive health economic model will be developed and applied to the evolution, implementation and evaluation of consumer-directed care in an Australian community aged care setting. A mixed methods approach comprising qualitative interviews and a discrete choice experiment will determine the attitudes and preferences of older people and their informal carers for consumer-directed care. The results of the qualitative interviews and the discrete choice experiment will inform the introduction of a new consumer-directed care innovation in service delivery. The cost-effectiveness of consumer-directed care will be evaluated by comparing incremental changes in resource use, costs and health and quality of life outcomes relative to traditional services. The discrete choice experiment will be repeated at the end of the implementation period to determine the extent to which attitudes and preferences change as a consequence of experience of consumer-directed care. The proposed framework will have wide applicability in the future development and economic evaluation of new innovations across the health and aged care sectors.
Ethics and dissemination: The study is approved by Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee (Project No. 6114/SBREC). Findings from the qualitative interviews, discrete choice experiments and the economic evaluation will be reported at a workshop of stakeholders to be held in 2015 and will be documented in reports and in peer reviewed journal articles.
Keywords: Geriatric Medicine; Health Economics; Public Health.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Similar articles
-
Developing a new quality of life instrument with older people for economic evaluation in aged care: study protocol.BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e028647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028647. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31129602 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;140:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Soc Sci Med. 2015. PMID: 26210656
-
Important features of home-based support services for older Australians and their informal carers.Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Nov;23(6):654-64. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12185. Epub 2015 Feb 8. Health Soc Care Community. 2015. PMID: 25660237
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37830206 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utilities from Older People's Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire (OPQoL-Brief) Scores.Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):39-54. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0259-3. Patient. 2018. PMID: 28623629
-
Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation.Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1069-1079. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01158-2. Epub 2022 Aug 4. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022. PMID: 35922616 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a new quality of life instrument with older people for economic evaluation in aged care: study protocol.BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e028647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028647. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31129602 Free PMC article.
-
How do clients in Australia experience Consumer Directed Care?BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0838-8. BMC Geriatr. 2018. PMID: 29940873 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Australian Government Productivity Commission. Trends in aged care services: some implications. Productivity Commission Research Paper. September 2008
-
- Treasury. Intergenerational Report. Canberra, 2010
-
- Commonwealth of Australia. Living longer. Living better. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2012
-
- National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC). A healthier future for all Australians: final report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. June 2009 - PubMed
-
- Aged and Community Services Australia. Consumer Directed Care in Community Care. November 2008
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources