Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):238-45.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu122. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

Estimation of the standardized risk difference and ratio in a competing risks framework: application to injection drug use and progression to AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy

Collaborators
Multicenter Study

Estimation of the standardized risk difference and ratio in a competing risks framework: application to injection drug use and progression to AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy

Stephen R Cole et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

There are few published examples of absolute risk estimated from epidemiologic data subject to censoring and competing risks with adjustment for multiple confounders. We present an example estimating the effect of injection drug use on 6-year risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) after initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy between 1998 and 2012 in an 8-site US cohort study with death before AIDS as a competing risk. We estimate the risk standardized to the total study sample by combining inverse probability weights with the cumulative incidence function; estimates of precision are obtained by bootstrap. In 7,182 patients (83% male, 33% African American, median age of 38 years), we observed 6-year standardized AIDS risks of 16.75% among 1,143 injection drug users and 12.08% among 6,039 nonusers, yielding a standardized risk difference of 4.68 (95% confidence interval: 1.27, 8.08) and a standardized risk ratio of 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.12, 1.72). Results may be sensitive to the assumptions of exposure-version irrelevance, no measurement bias, and no unmeasured confounding. These limitations suggest that results be replicated with refined measurements of injection drug use. Nevertheless, estimating the standardized risk difference and ratio is straightforward, and injection drug use appears to increase the risk of AIDS.

Keywords: AIDS; HIV; cohort study; competing risks; survival function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Crude risk of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) (solid line) and death (dashed line, stacked) among 7,182 human immunodeficiency virus–positive adults from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems who initiated antiretroviral therapy between 1998 and 2012. A) For non–injection drug users, B) for injection drug users.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Standardized risk of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) (solid line) and death (dashed line, stacked) among 7,182 human immunodeficiency virus–positive adults from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems who initiated antiretroviral therapy between 1998 and 2012. A) For non–injection drug users, B) for injection drug user.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Standardized acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) A) risk difference and B) risk ratio for injection drug use among 7,182 human immunodeficiency virus–positive adults from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems who initiated antiretroviral therapy between 1998 and 2012. Dots placed at times of incident AIDS cases with overlaid smoothing spline.

References

    1. Greenland S. Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(4):301–305. - PubMed
    1. Hernán MA. The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):13–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toh S, Hernández-Díaz S, Logan R, et al. Estimating absolute risks in the presence of nonadherence: an application to a follow-up study with baseline randomization. Epidemiology. 2010;21(4):528–539. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robins JM, Morgenstern H. The foundations of confounding in epidemiology. Comput Math Appl. 1987;14(9-12):869–916.
    1. Greenland S. Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference. Epidemiology. 1996;7(5):498–501. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances