The Copenhagen Primary Care Differential Count (CopDiff) database
- PMID: 24966694
- PMCID: PMC4062550
- DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S60991
The Copenhagen Primary Care Differential Count (CopDiff) database
Abstract
Background: The differential blood cell count provides valuable information about a person's state of health. Together with a variety of biochemical variables, these analyses describe important physiological and pathophysiological relations. There is a need for research databases to explore associations between these parameters, concurrent comorbidities, and future disease outcomes.
Methods and results: The Copenhagen General Practitioners' Laboratory is the only laboratory serving general practitioners in the Copenhagen area, covering approximately 1.2 million inhabitants. The Copenhagen General Practitioners' Laboratory has registered all analytical results since July 1, 2000. The Copenhagen Primary Care Differential Count database contains all differential blood cell count results (n=1,308,022) from July 1, 2000 to January 25, 2010 requested by general practitioners, along with results from analysis of various other blood components. This data set is merged with detailed data at a person level from The Danish Cancer Registry, The Danish National Patient Register, The Danish Civil Registration System, and The Danish Register of Causes of Death.
Conclusion: This paper reviews methodological issues behind the construction of the Copenhagen Primary Care Differential Count database as well as the distribution of characteristics of the population it covers and the variables that are recorded. Finally, it gives examples of its use as an inspiration to peers for collaboration.
Keywords: differential leukocyte count; nationwide health registers; research.
Figures
References
-
- Siemens laboratory diagnostic services [webpage on the Internet] [Accessed May 18, 2014]. Available from: http://www.healthcare.siemens.com/services/laboratory-diagnostics.
-
- Andersen CL, Siersma VD, Hasselbalch HC, et al. Eosinophilia in routine blood samples and the subsequent risk of hematological malignancies and death. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(10):843–847. - PubMed
-
- Woodward M. In: Epidemiology: Study Design And Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Chatfield C, Zidek JV, editors. Boca Rotan, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2005. pp. 124–126.
-
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. - PubMed
-
- Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika. 1993;80(3):557–572.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
