Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 18;7(3):441-5.
doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.10. eCollection 2014.

Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes

Affiliations

Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes

Qing-Hua Yang et al. Int J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of axial length (AL) measurements obtained from immersion B-scan ultrasonography (immersion B-scan) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in patients with high myopia and cataracts.

Methods: Immersion B-scan, contact A-scan ultrasonography (contact A-scan), and the IOLMaster were used to preoperatively measure the AL in 102 eyes from 102 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the AL: one containing patients with 22 mm≤AL<26 mm(group A) and the other containing patients with AL≥26 mm (group B). The mean error (ME) was calculated from the difference between the AL measurement methods predicted refractive error and the actual postoperative refractive error.

Results: In group A, ALs measured by immersion B-scan (23.48±1.15) didn't differ significantly from those measured by the IOLMaster (23.52±1.17) or from those by contact A-scan (23.38±1.20). In the same group, the standard deviation (SD) of the mean error (ME) of immersion B-scan (-0.090±0.397 D) didn't differ significantly from those of IOLMaster (-0.095±0.411 D) and contact A-scan (-0.099±0.425 D). In group B, ALs measured by immersion B-scan (27.97±2.21 mm) didn't differ significantly from those of the IOLMaster (27.86±2.18 mm), but longer than those measured by Contact A-scan (27.75±2.23 mm, P=0.009). In the same group, the standard deviation (SD) of the mean error (ME) of immersion B-scan (-0.635±0.157 D) didn't differ significantly from those of the IOLMaster (-0.679±0.359 D), but differed significantly from those of contact A-scan (-0.953±1.713 D, P=0.028).

Conclusion: Immersion B-scan exhibits measurement accuracy comparable to that of the IOLMaster, and is thus a good alternative in measuring AL in eyes with high myopia when the IOLMaster can't be used, and it is more accurate than the contact A-scan.

Keywords: axial length; high myopia; immersion; measurement; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. First quality control measure for immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry
The vector an ultrasound sampling line was determined to be exactly perpendicular to the double bands of the cornea and the center of the lens capsule, and directed at the center of the macula.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Second quality control measure for immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry
The intersection of the vector an ultrasound sampling line and the retina was determined to be 4.5 mm from the optic disc or 3 mm from the optic disc edge.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Axial length measurement by immersion B-scan ultrasound
AL was defined as the distance from the corneal vertex to the macula or from the crest of the anterior corneal surface to the crest of the macular retinal surface with an electronic measuring scale in B-mode ultrasound.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472–485. - PubMed
    1. Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):13–17. - PubMed
    1. Jin H, Rabsilber T, Ehmer A, Borkenstein AF, Limberger IJ, Guo H, Auffarth GU. Comparison of ray-tracing method and thin-lens formula in intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(4):650–662. - PubMed
    1. Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. Formula choice Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(1):63–71. - PubMed
    1. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368–376. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources