Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes
- PMID: 24967188
- PMCID: PMC4067656
- DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.10
Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of axial length (AL) measurements obtained from immersion B-scan ultrasonography (immersion B-scan) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in patients with high myopia and cataracts.
Methods: Immersion B-scan, contact A-scan ultrasonography (contact A-scan), and the IOLMaster were used to preoperatively measure the AL in 102 eyes from 102 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the AL: one containing patients with 22 mm≤AL<26 mm(group A) and the other containing patients with AL≥26 mm (group B). The mean error (ME) was calculated from the difference between the AL measurement methods predicted refractive error and the actual postoperative refractive error.
Results: In group A, ALs measured by immersion B-scan (23.48±1.15) didn't differ significantly from those measured by the IOLMaster (23.52±1.17) or from those by contact A-scan (23.38±1.20). In the same group, the standard deviation (SD) of the mean error (ME) of immersion B-scan (-0.090±0.397 D) didn't differ significantly from those of IOLMaster (-0.095±0.411 D) and contact A-scan (-0.099±0.425 D). In group B, ALs measured by immersion B-scan (27.97±2.21 mm) didn't differ significantly from those of the IOLMaster (27.86±2.18 mm), but longer than those measured by Contact A-scan (27.75±2.23 mm, P=0.009). In the same group, the standard deviation (SD) of the mean error (ME) of immersion B-scan (-0.635±0.157 D) didn't differ significantly from those of the IOLMaster (-0.679±0.359 D), but differed significantly from those of contact A-scan (-0.953±1.713 D, P=0.028).
Conclusion: Immersion B-scan exhibits measurement accuracy comparable to that of the IOLMaster, and is thus a good alternative in measuring AL in eyes with high myopia when the IOLMaster can't be used, and it is more accurate than the contact A-scan.
Keywords: axial length; high myopia; immersion; measurement; ultrasonography.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Accuracy of segmented measurement of axial length in ultra-high myopia filled with silicone oil using immersion B-scan ultrasonography.Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 May 18;15(5):793-799. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.05.16. eCollection 2022. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35601170 Free PMC article.
-
[Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;50(1):32-6. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 24709131 Chinese.
-
Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster).Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;32(3):241-248. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0063. Epub 2018 May 15. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29770644 Free PMC article.
-
Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.017. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008. PMID: 18242451
-
Calibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMaster.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jul;31(7):1345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.066. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005. PMID: 16105605
Cited by
-
Predicting Axial Length From Choroidal Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography Images With Machine Learning Based Algorithms.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 28;9:850284. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.850284. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35836947 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of postoperative refractive outcome in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy vs cataract surgery following vitrectomy.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 May;258(5):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04583-w. Epub 2020 Jan 10. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31925516
-
Comparison axial length measurements from three biometric instruments in high myopia.Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 18;9(6):876-80. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.06.15. eCollection 2016. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27366691 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective assessment of accuracy of nine intraocular lens power calculation formulae in eyes with axial myopia.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 1;72(4):549-553. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1542_23. Epub 2024 Mar 28. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38546469 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of segmented measurement of axial length in ultra-high myopia filled with silicone oil using immersion B-scan ultrasonography.Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 May 18;15(5):793-799. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.05.16. eCollection 2022. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35601170 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472–485. - PubMed
-
- Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):13–17. - PubMed
-
- Jin H, Rabsilber T, Ehmer A, Borkenstein AF, Limberger IJ, Guo H, Auffarth GU. Comparison of ray-tracing method and thin-lens formula in intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(4):650–662. - PubMed
-
- Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. Formula choice Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(1):63–71. - PubMed
-
- Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368–376. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous