Analysis of glistenings in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on visual performance
- PMID: 24967189
- PMCID: PMC4067657
- DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.11
Analysis of glistenings in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on visual performance
Abstract
Aim: To assess patients' visual performance with glistenings in one piece soft hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Alcon) 2 years postoperatively.
Methods: This cross section trial included 120 eyes with one piece IOL at 2 years postoperatively. Glistening was classified in 4 groups, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (most evident) according to their severity in IOLs optics observed under a slit lamp. All eyes underwent a uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity evaluation (UCVA and BCVA, LogMAR scale), a complete clinical examination, a contrast sensitivity (CS) evaluation by F.A.C.T chart, and a visual field test by Humphrey Field Analyzer ‖ (HFA). One-way ANOVA was used for quantitative data, while Pearson χ (2) test was used for qualitative data to analyze the visual function of 4 glistening groups.
Results: Totally 120 eyes were enrolled with 30 eyes in each glistening group. There was no statistical correlation between glistening grades and patients' age, IOLs power, postoperative UCVA and BCVA (P>0.05). Quantificationally, CS values among each group were not statistically different. However, qualitative analysis showed there were more eyes in grade 3 group than in grade 0 group having abnormally declined CS at high spatial frequency (10% vs 36.7% at 18 cpd, P=0.029; 6.7% vs 26.7% at 12 cpd, P=0.013). Mean deviation (MD) of the visual field test was -2.14±2.31, -1.97±2.23, -3.02±3.17, -4.12±3.38 in group 0 to 3 respectively. There was a significant decrease in the most serious glistenings group (P =0.018).
Conclusion: Glistenings may potentially have an impact on contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequency and MD in visual field test.
Keywords: cataract; contrast sensitivity; hydrophobic acrylic; intraocular lens; mean deviation.
Figures
References
-
- Anderson C, Koch DD, Green G, Patel A, van Noy S. Alcon AcrySof™ acrylic intraocular lens. In: Martin RG, Gills JP, Sanders DR, editors. Foldable Intraocular Lenses. Thorofare, Slack; 1993. pp. 161–177.
-
- Wilkins E, Olson RJ. Glistenings with long-term follow-up of the Surgidev B20/20 polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(5):783–785. - PubMed
-
- Cisneros-Lanuza A, Hurtado-Sarrio M, Duch-Samper A, Gallego-Pinazo R, Menezo-Rozalen JL. Glistenings in the Artiflex phakic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(8):1405–1408. - PubMed
-
- Colin J, Orignac I, Touboul D. Glistenings in a large series of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(12):2121–2126. - PubMed
-
- Behndig A, Monestam E. Quantification of glistenings in intraocular lenses using Scheimpflug photography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(1):14–17. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources