Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Sep;105(3):327-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

Interventions to maintain cardiac risk control after discharge from a cardiovascular risk reduction clinic: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Interventions to maintain cardiac risk control after discharge from a cardiovascular risk reduction clinic: a randomized controlled trial

Tracey H Taveira et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of two maintenance strategies compared to usual care after discharge from a pharmacist-led cardiovascular risk reduction clinic (CRRC).

Methods: Open-label, randomized-controlled trial of 200 consecutive CRRC patients that met clinic discharge criteria (HbA1c ≤7% (53 mmol/mol); blood pressure ≤140/80 mmHg for those with diabetes and ≤140/90 mmHg for those without diabetes; and an LDL-cholesterol ≤2.59 mmol/l). Participants were randomized to either quarterly group medical visits or quarterly CRRC individual clinic visits, or a usual care control arm with the standard primary care alone first in a 1:1:1 ratio, followed by a 2:2:1 ratio after first 100 patients. Primary outcome measures were time to failure for guideline recommended goals of HbA1c and blood pressure over 12-months.

Results: Of the 200 participants randomized, 89% had diabetes and were similar in other cardiovascular risk factors. After 1-year, the HbA1c failure rate was 0.36 [95% CI, 0.28-0.47] per quarter for the group medical visit arm, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.18-0.33] per quarter for the quarterly CRRC individual arm and, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.96] per quarter for the usual care control arm, p<0.001. The rate of failure for blood pressure was 0.31 [95% CI, 0.23-0.41] per quarter for the group medical visit arm, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.16-0.30] per quarter for the CRRC individual arm and, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.40-0.71] per quarter the control arm, p<0.001.

Conclusion: After discharge from a CRRC program, both individual and group interventions are more effective in maintaining glycemia and blood pressure control for patients with diabetes than usual care after 1-year of follow-up.

Keywords: Blood pressure; Diabetes; Hemoglobin A1c; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources